Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expat_panama
Asserting that jurisdictional prerogatives exist because such were exercised illegally does not make them legal.

[ERROR 272924: post reading halted on snarky over limit violation] …
Then avoid being snarky, like I do. The Founding Fathers insisted on the rule of law versus the rule of men.
83 posted on 04/27/2015 2:15:44 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai
Asserting that jurisdictional prerogatives exist because such were exercised illegally does not make them legal.

That's absolutely true, and likewise our mere belief that a particular action by the state is wrong doesn't make it illegal either --unless we've decided that we somehow possess the power of Ultimate Truth but I digress. 

Let's talk about what is, and we agree that like it or not states have in fact exercised the authority to determine what the requirements for marriage apply.  Up till now.  This bit with the left-wing statists making it a federal issue is bad news.  Talk about "illegal"...

86 posted on 04/27/2015 2:59:42 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson