First two posts from the usual politically clueless circular firing squad.
If a candidate says no more immigration ever, then they are finished.
But being careful about how things are phrased might actually get someone elected.
Of course, the first two posters here do not want our side to win....they want to foam at the mouth and scream at the clouds thinking that will fix everything.
You would think that a guy that battled unions and leftist agitators can make a coherent, clear case for stopping illegal aliens and overhauling the legal immigration process.
If Walker is nominated and starts spewing this "pathway to citizenship" crap I'm staying home.
I’m with you, Erik. Seems to me Cruz and Walker are far closer on immigration than apart. Both are saying we have to control the border and enforce the law. Both are talking about tightly controlled legal immigration.
Cruz may want more legal immigrants, but I don’t hear him saying it should be unlimited. Walker, on the other hand, may want less legal immigration, but that’s not quite what I heard him say in this interview. Putting the needs of America and Americans first may very well result in periods of increased legal immigration.
Some people don’t feel right if they aren’t destroying every other candidate but their own. Some people also love to create conflict where there’s little or none, aka the circular firing squad. Personally? I find these people pathetic.