When the NYT speaks, the question is not what are they saying.
The question is why are they saying what they’re saying.
Because they lie. So the thing to do is figure out the motive. Loss of credibility is the price they pay for being liars.
The MSM has a pre convention position and a post convention position. Neither of which have anything remotely to do with promoting a president candidate who will do a good job - which is always centered on protecting the constitution
The times wants opposite. Actually
So - we know their post convention position is to promote the anti American death cult representative in the democrat nominee position
That’s primary
What makes that job more fun for them?
Duh. Promoting the GOP er easiest to go after in the post convention
They’re not reporting on the dem contenders
They’ a always worked for the toons
Whom can the dem beat? That’s who the times promotes at this point
And whichever GOP er schmoozed the times is the one to keep out of the nomination
That person is too weak to depend on conservatives and too stupid to realize the times will be counted on to turn on the GOP nominee midnight convention day
It’s a lot like staying away from the teachers pet
Questio:
HOW do people here, on this site, which cut it’s teeth on politician - MSM corruption?