It’s ok to die of thirst as long as my beachfront property or view of the Pacific Ocean isn’t impacted.
This is the LA Times reasoning? They provide no answers, as usual. No realistic solutions, as usual.
But I Would be willing to bet the same author approves of a 100 billion dollar train to nowhere.
Yup. They attack this as too costly but have no problem with public transit that is more expensive than most any other option.
If the LA Times is against it then it must work.
So why not just salt water aqueduct to the desalination plants located a mile or whatever inshore. Minimal view spoilage.
“But I Would be willing to bet the same author approves of a 100 billion dollar train to nowhere.”
He does. Michael Hiltzik is a mainstream Green and a Jerry Brown buttboy.