Interesting question. I just heard about this only a day or two ago on one of the Fox News shows. If it is older news I would be interested in the hearing who was the initial source.
As to Gowdy pursuing GE - that would seem to be a natural course. If I were Gowdy I would ask politely for the e-mails, give GE a week to reply and then off to court or, as an alternative, issue some sort of congressional subpoena - assuming that is possible.
Ask the Chinese or the Russians as they have copy’s of every email and all the papers. Here’s a riddle, if NSA has all my cell calls and emails do you think they have Hillary’s too?
Hi IP, my understanding is that the question was asked by a shareholder (also a journalist) of Immelt at the most recent Annual Shareholder meeting. It was during an open question period. It made me start thinking that Representative Gowdy could/should pursue the emails from all domestic contributors to the Clinton group. If I were prosecuting, I would want the emails from others before questioning Hillary. Your thoughts?
In reading his proposed questions I believe that Hillary will never voluntarily agree to testify. When she does (under subpoena) she would be smart to take the 5th. She’s had her chance, and will not be able to bend the truth to conform to her desire. The dragnet is slowly closing around her.
Gwjack