Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado businessman blames 'stoned' workers for move to SC
FOX NEWS ^ | April 24, 2015

Posted on 04/24/2015 1:47:42 PM PDT by McGruff

When workers at his Colorado business went to pot, Mark Brawner said it was enough for him to roll out of the Rockies and head for South Carolina.

Brawner, who ran Little Spider Creations out of an old Denver warehouse for years until this month, told KUSA-TV Thursday he moved because pot was hurting his company. He said employees started to come to work stoned after the state legalized the drug for recreational use in 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: cannabis; colorado; homosexualagenda; liberals4pot; libertarians; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; pot; potheads; redstates; southcarolina; wod; workforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: rawcatslyentist

My comment was not a “hooray for me” that I can have a drink or two and not get drunk. The point was that a social drink was not intended to get buzzed. The point of smoking a joint IS to get buzzed.

I have never seen a stoner smoke a joint (or whatever method they favor) like it was a drink or two, or a cigarette. It was consumed with the specific intent to get a buzz. And that is the difference.

Sure there are alcoholics, I know many, who do drink... not to get drunk, but their BAC is 0.15% or better and they aren’t drunk. I have a friend who got pulled over for “crossing the fog line”. Blew a 0.32% and the deputy who wrote him up stated the “ at 0.32% the subject did not appear intoxicated”. That’s not an “I had a few too many”, or a hobby, that’s a career.

Even a regular user of cannabis may require more to get high, but the still smoke with the intent of getting a buzz it’s never a “wow time got away from me, and I did too much”


101 posted on 04/24/2015 5:20:41 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Understood.

A high dosage of Imitrex kinda worked for me years ago, but the hallucinatory side effects made it an unpleasant option. I stumbled onto Aleve, however, which works well when taken early. I’ve heard about the burning effects it can have on the throat and stomach.


102 posted on 04/24/2015 5:21:42 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Even when I was a teenager I could quit for a month to pass a drug screen and that was for minimum wage jobs.


103 posted on 04/24/2015 5:48:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I wonder who will be next to move...?


104 posted on 04/24/2015 6:13:03 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo CM54Marijuana-Not-Crack-Posters.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Fight !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


105 posted on 04/24/2015 6:15:29 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I call BS.

They were already stoned.


106 posted on 04/24/2015 6:16:50 PM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Great. Now all he has to worry about is meth.


107 posted on 04/24/2015 6:56:44 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
>"I have never seen a stoner smoke a joint (or whatever method they favor) "

You haven't seen much. Ever heard of a one hitter? No?

The herb has it's own way of nullifying abuse. It's called tolerance build. Abusers build up tolerance to a point where they can not get high anymore. Stupidly a lot of them continue to puff away to no avail.

You are ASSuming every one that partakes of the First Gift abuses it. Just like alcohol, there are many that don't abuse it.

But hey kick in their doors like krystalnact, it's the law! Do you know how many Nazis broke the law on krystalnact?

Some people smoke for the flavor! When prohibition is finally repealed look for RJ Reynolds and the other big tobacco producers to put out low to no Thc packs.

108 posted on 04/24/2015 11:06:36 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bucky14

“Come to Greenville SC. It will knock you out how nice it is.
Plus BMW HQ is down the road and all the companies that supply. Great place to live. Unreal downtown.”

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


109 posted on 04/25/2015 5:02:01 AM PDT by 4everontheRight (And the story began with..."Once there was a great nation......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

“The continued popularity of the senior senator from SC makes me suspect that a good percentage of that state’s population is walking around in a drug-induced daze also.”.......

The reason Grahamy keeps getting re-elected in SC....two words...OPEN PRIMARIES! The Dems vote as Repubs amd he is in every time. You can see the most evidence of this by the area that Grahamy is from...the Upstate of SC, very conservative area, Grahamy can’t carry. He loses this area and even his OWN HOME TOWN every election. The areas that are very liberal in SC....Charleston, etc. vote for Grahamy every single time. The election is wide open. Hence why the Dems never run a candidate against Grahamy, they don’t need to....he is one “of those”!


110 posted on 04/25/2015 5:10:24 AM PDT by 4everontheRight (And the story began with..."Once there was a great nation......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; AppyPappy
Even when I was a teenager I could quit for a month to pass a drug screen and that was for minimum wage jobs.

It must have been fake pot. /s

But seriously: research shows that of all those who have ever used pot, 9% have at some point been dependent - whereas the corresponding figure for alcohol is 15% and tobacco 32%.

111 posted on 04/25/2015 9:55:28 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

The % will change as weed becomes legal.


112 posted on 04/25/2015 11:48:15 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Why would it? It's a percentage of those who have used - the absolute numbers may change, but there's no obvious reaon why the ratio would.
113 posted on 04/25/2015 11:52:28 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Because the illegality/cost may have been the deciding factor not to become a habit.


114 posted on 04/25/2015 12:01:37 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
the illegality/cost may have been the deciding factor not to become a habit.

And yet it wasn't a factor in deciding to nonhabitually use? Doesn't add up.

And if one can decide to not become dependent, whether because of illegality or cost or anything else, it's a poor excuse for a dependency.

115 posted on 04/25/2015 12:04:00 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You smoke weed in college but you recognize it can get you fired in the real world.


116 posted on 04/25/2015 12:08:04 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
What happens if a worker causes an accident while hungover on booze?

Company gets sued. If they knew about his problem and did nothing, they are generally found liable.

117 posted on 04/25/2015 3:09:22 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Thank you.


118 posted on 04/26/2015 1:29:38 AM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson