“An exam done on Donna Rayhons that night found no sign of injury. Also, lab tests done on swabs from that exam found no conclusive evidence she’d recently had sex.”
How was this not abusive? How was she supposed to understand this violation? Poor woman.
That was one of my questions, as well.
In order to obtain the “evidence” (or lack thereof!) they had to do things that this woman apparently couldn’t understand or consent to any more than she could the purported ‘violation’ that her husband was accused of.
He probably abused her not at all; while the ‘law’ did.
-JT