I suppose the democrats have a list called “the top 2,000 potential republican leaders”. They fax out that list to the media and to local democrat offices, and their job is to ask inexperienced politicians rigged questions. Using these answers, they can then seed them into conservative conversations and have conservatives fight one another while they’re also killing off their young.
How else are we to choose a candidate if we do not discuss honestly the strengths and weaknesses of our candidate? Are we to ignore it when they contradict themselves? I don’t consider honest discussion “eating our own”. This isn’t National Enquirer “gotchas”.
I think most of us here have been sticking to the facts, making an effort to support our statements using links and comparing the candidates based on their statements and policies. That’s our job as voting citizens.
I don’t believe in party loyalty. I’m not a republican.