Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants

Depends on the costs involved with moving dependents.

There are 3200 sailors (ships company, not airwing) deployed to Japan on Washingon. Another 3200 in Norfolk on Roosevelt and yet another 3200 on Reagan in San Diego.

Keeping the crews with their ships would entail moving those 9600 sailors’ households to the ships’ new homeports. Iow logistically difficult and prohibitively expensive.


18 posted on 04/20/2015 1:18:46 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

I could see that. When I was in the Navy, they tried to keep you at one duty station for your entire career to save money on relocation costs.


21 posted on 04/20/2015 1:26:56 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: tanknetter

I don’t think that’s an illogical concern, but why now?

Why never before? If this was such a great concern, it would have been at other times too.

Why relocate the families? The crews are at sea for months at a time. When they come back to port, they can travel home.

How have they done it in the past? What has changed?


23 posted on 04/20/2015 1:32:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson