Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brad from Tennessee; SJackson; DoughtyOne
That is what the war was about—protecting the Saudis, the Gulf oil states and Israel from Saddam Hussein and his marauding army.

Yes and I think that:

  1. Israel could have handled Saddam
  2. BUT the Saudis/Qataris would not have been able to do so

We should have left the peninsular Arabs to their fate.

100 posted on 04/20/2015 4:20:48 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

But that fate would not have stopped on the Peninsula. It would have gobbled up Jordan, Egypt, Libya... down across Africa.

We’re talking about a massive occupation and swap-out of governments to become one massive nation.

During the process that effort would expend it’s energy to develop WMDs and seek more territory.

Why allow that to happen? It wouldn’t be good. It seems to me a stable region with governments in place is a much safer world.


126 posted on 04/20/2015 11:20:47 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson