Two things that bug the heck out of me, that are never spoken of on TV or analysed by the media.
Democrats complain about questions using the words “swiftboating” meaning our side unfairly attacked their candidate. What’s with that? Swiftboating was talking truth to power in that Kerry lied and was outed by other veterans for the lies. How does that translate into something negative?
Second, Hitlary said “trickle down” did not work and Republican policies of the past were failures. Really, what’s the opposite of trickle down and how would that work? Haven’t we been using socialistic trickle up since Pelosi and the Democrats won control in 1997. Giving free money to the poor does not stimulate entrepreneurs to invest in new companies or products. So perhaps the media could use their infinite powers of observation to prove the theory by asking anyone on the left how it works and where it’s ever worked?
(Sorry, slow morning here.)
We need to reclaim/recover that term and deliberately start using it as we expose them for lying socialists and RATagandists that they are.
We need to couple that with a quote from Truman: "I wasn't giving them Hell. I told the truth and they just thought it was Hell."
Start "Swiftboating" the RATs!...and say as much. Use our definition.
Haven’t we been using socialistic trickle up since Pelosi and the Democrats won control in 1997.
No, it's all trickle down, Reagan's concept is simply a description of natural free market dynamics. Rich people build companies and employ people to run them and do the grunt work.
Real "trickle down" is what the RATs do; confiscate trillion$ from the American workers and give most of it to the ultimate parasitic class....nameless faceless union thug bureaucRATs. What pittance is left over is used to buy votes from the "world owes me a living" parasites.
And they could give a RATs @$$ about the truly needy.