Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker
way to do that is to rip it out of the government's authority to define it

By what authority will people be able to take the word "marriage" out of the government's dictionary?

66 posted on 04/19/2015 10:23:11 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
By what authority will people be able to take the word "marriage" out of the government's dictionary?

Not rip it out, redefine it. And that would come from a Congressional Bill to change "marriage licenses" to "civil union registrations." And pretty much leave them as they already are - a sworn affadavit by two people to be treated as a limited corporation for specific purposes by the government.

Because whether you realize it or not, that's what a government "marriage license" already is, and already does - ONLY.

And that's why I object to it being called "marriage," because it's not anything of the kind right now, without changing anything at all. So what I'm really arguing for is truth in advertising.

67 posted on 04/19/2015 12:59:06 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson