Hillary Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago

New York Slimes ^ | April 15, 2015 | MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT

[JewishRighter]

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton was directly asked by congressional investigators in a December 2012 letter whether she had used a private email account while serving as secretary of state, according to letters obtained by The New York Times.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” I don’t recall”

[JewishRighter]

Of course, there was no follow-up by Issa’s committee. No one made an issue that the Secretary of State and likely next presidential candidate was stonewalling Congress about the death of an Ambassador and 3 other brave Americans. Sickening.

Dems will vote for the criminal in the pantsuit anyway. But Republicans, especially Issa, are despicable, too.

[llevrok]

let me guess. when she was asked, she said she did not use private eMail. In other words: lied. Now THERE’S a shocker

[TexasCajun]

Another email story from the leftist NYTimes?

Somebody wants to keep the pressure on the old girl.

[JewishRighter]

No, she just blew him off, never answered. And he allowed himself to be blown off. And I don’t mean a Lewinsky, either.

[eyeamok]

there was no follow-up by Issa’s committee.”

Issa and Gowdy BOTH have had this information and MUCH MORE for a long long time, they covered everything up intentionally so as to protect the Leadership of Both parties. Judicial Watch is embarrassing them by releasing info to the public that CONGRESS ALREADY HAD.

Watch them spin this to say it is Old News.

[C210N]

I can see the Slimes doing one of:

Paving the way for Fake Indian, or...

Creating “That’s just Old News” today, for use in the future.

[Theoria]

'An aide to Mrs. Clinton said in a statement Tuesday that “her usage was widely known to the over 100 department and U.S. government colleagues she emailed, as her address was visible on every email she sent.”'

I guess that counters the whole, not sure where if her email was 'visible' nonsense that was put out some weeks ago.

Not only that, then there is a obvious paper trail of emails she sent with .gov coworkers, where are those?

[ClearCase_guy]

There are a number of “serious” Republicans (Gowdy, Issa, etc.) who are “building cases” against corrupt Democrats. Democrats who are OBVIOUSLY guilty.

Nothing
Ever
Happens

Occam’s Razor: They aren’t serious about investigating.

[SMARTY]

Unless the MSM agrees to keep these kinds of questions OUT of national televised debates.. (and I ain’t say’n that WON’T happen) she is toast!

Keeping all her BS lies, corruption and failures off the table is as much as handing her a gag order... she won’t have ANYTHING else to talk about! :)

[tacticalogic]

Occam’s Razor: They aren’t serious about investigating.

Or the game is rigged so that no matter what the investigation finds, there's nothing they can do about it.

[ClearCase_guy]

Imagine the debate:

Moderator: Mr. Cruz, could you explain how you would approach a sudden foreign policy crisis?

Ted Cruz: Well, I can tell you that I'd handle it better than Hillary handled Benghazi. I'd --

Moderator: I'm sorry Mr. Cruz, the red light is flashing and that means you're out of time. Question for you Mrs Clinton -- What's the best part of being a grandmother?"

[G Larry]

It would have been so easy for the Senator to respond to Hillary’s “What difference, at this point, does it make....” question, with:

“The difference, Madame Secretary, is the truth and the motivation for your dereliction of duty to protect Ambassador Stevens. Your inability to recognize that difference suggests to me that it’s time to consider submitting your resignation!”

[SMARTY]

That is TOO plausible to be funny!

[cookcounty]

" Mr. Issa was leading an investigation into how the Obama administration handled its officials’ use of personal email."

False, it was an investigation into the kiling of 4 State Department officials in Benghazi and a search for the communication that occurred as the events were unfolding. The NYT reporter (and editor?), following the practice at NYT, tried to minimize the issue by making it look like the committee merely had an idle curiosity about Clinton's mode of communication. CONTEXT, NYT, CONTEXT! Look it up in your dictionary.

[b4its2late]

What difference does it make?

[sasquatch]

Did Sandy Burgler maintain her server?

[lodi90]

Occam’s Razor: They aren’t serious about investigating.

—

Exactamundo. Intent hearings is to give some red meat to the bases of BOTH parties. GOP will not provoke actual conflict with Obama admin.

Boehner & McConnell have steadfastly refused to substantively engage the kenyan ever since Romney lost. It’s all beltway kabuki at this point. The beltway GOP simply do not care that Main Street has been assaulted over and over by this admin.

[PLD]