Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest

I hate to disagree with Levin but my understanding is that Obutt is trying to call this deal with Iran an Executive Agreement which does not require advise and consent. The Senate is attempting to get some control over the situation by passing a veto proof bill which does give them advise and consent over the situation. Normally the Senate only ratifies treaties. I’m not sure what other course the Senate can take other than just grouse about it.


22 posted on 04/15/2015 7:41:28 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Georgia Girl 2

The truth is, the Senate would never have been put in this position if they had put the brakes on Obama a long time ago.

Obama has violated his oath as President on a daily basis. All they did was grouse about it.

The fools gave up their power the minute they bacame too cowardly to live up to their own oath.


23 posted on 04/15/2015 7:46:12 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson