Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross

Her answer was something to the effect of

there should be no legislation that interferes with the decision made between a woman and her “doctor”.

This was an answer to the question of “is it ok to kill a 7 lb baby in the womb”.


24 posted on 04/15/2015 6:24:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
... Her answer was something to the effect of

there should be no legislation that interferes with the decision made between a woman and her “doctor”.

Exactly. Which, as several earlier posters highlighted ... you mean legislation like 0bamacare, Debbie?! Oh ... wait ...

being a democRAT ... means never having to explain when you say something that is completely contradictory to other things you also say.

25 posted on 04/15/2015 6:33:40 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

“When she’s the victim of rape, the victim of incest? Are we going to let a woman die? Would Rand Paul let a woman die because she’s carrying a baby or is he going to let her make that choice with her doctor?” she said during an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer last night.”

If a woman is raped or a victim of incest why would she wait 20+ weeks before having an abortion? Sounds to me like Schultz is not advocating a patient/doctor decision but a way to emotionally destroy women and blame it on Republicans.


26 posted on 04/15/2015 6:34:28 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Islam, the Communists enforcers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson