Posted on 04/15/2015 5:15:56 AM PDT by GIdget2004
“A female shouldn’t be President,” is a direct quote from a Dallas woman’s Facebook page.
As you might imagine, the post has attracted quite a bit of attention from people across the country. CBS 11’s Steve Pickett caught up with Cheryl Rios, the CEO of Go Ape Marketing, and asked her to explain the comment.
“I believe in what I said,” she told Pickett. “There’s an old biblical sound reasoning why a woman shouldn’t be President.”
Here’s the full text of her post: “If this happens – I am moving to Canada. There is NO need for her as she is not the right person to run our country – but more importantly a female shouldn’t be president. Let the haters begin . . . but with the hormones we have there is no way we should be able to start a war. Yes I run my own business and I love it and I am great at it BUT that is not the same as being the President, that should be left to a man, a good, strong, honorable man.”
Rios posted her opinion in opposition to Hillary Clinton’s announcement as a Presidential candidate for the 2016 election. But Rios went well beyond a political position. She says a President should always be a man.
“We’re built differently, we have different hormones,” she said. “In the world we live in, we have equal rights…and I support all of that. I don’t support a woman being President.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.cbslocal.com ...
Sounds articulate to me.
The story here isn’t that one woman posted this on Facebook. The story is that See-BS is going to extremes to circle the wagons for Hillary! by rooting out any person who opposes Her Highness as president and publicly shaming them. Its silly and disgusting.
May I respectfully disagree? I don’t want a woman for president either. I want a strong, honorable, God-fearing man in that office.
Come now, have we forgotten Golda and Maggie? I call BS.
BullCrap...
Brilliant!!
I have met other women with this same opinion. It is my observation that with some women, this would be a very legitimate concern.
My wife and I agree that women should never have got the vote. They should, however, not be barred from running for and holding elective office. In such a set of circumstances we would not have Mrs. Bill as a contender, but we might get a Mrs. Thatcher as a president.
With all due respect their ain’t much hormones left in that witch Demonic Party candidate.
“May I respectfully disagree? I don’t want a woman for president either. I want a strong, honorable, God-fearing man in that office.”
I’m with you, Sistah!
Let’s take a survey of men and women who have women as supervisors in their workplace and see if they think women should be in charge.
I’m guessing the NO responses would top 75%.
She is entitled to her opinion, which now appears to be some sort of crime in this country.
I’d take Thatcher any day.
MRS. BE will attest to your assessment.
There aren’t any strong God-fearing honorable men left.
She’s an idiot.
****************
In what way? Explain your declaritive statement. Thanks.
Yep.
But certainly the same is true with men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.