Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael van der Galien

It is incredibly selfish to commit to living a child-free lifestyle to maximize fun and freedom, then approaching the age of death suddenly decide to have children. 1 or 4 makes no difference. This woman is sinfully selfish to now want to bring children into the world when she knows it is very unlikely she will live to see them graduate high school, and if they do she will probably be in a home they can’t pay for or give her genuine care.

What a selfish brat.

Also, I understand autism rates are closely tied to elderly pregnancies. So she liable to have a couple of them be autistic as well. Should be fun raising 4 children all at once with one or 2 autistic, when you are 75 years old.

Good luck with that you selfish brat.

Horrible.


24 posted on 04/12/2015 9:31:12 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Lord God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

FWIW, I have no problem with couples who start a family in their 20s or 30s and just continue to have children naturally until the mother can’t conceive anymore. That is just a natural part of family life. Dad and mom have kids and if one happens to come along when Dad is 50 and mom is 45, well that is life.

Selfishness is a woman who doesn’t want the bother or hassle or responsibility of child rearing until she feels remorse about it at an advance age, and without any father in the picture takes advantage of modern technology to “create’ children she will abandon sooner than later by her natural death.

Just cruel in her selfishness.


25 posted on 04/12/2015 9:41:21 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Lord God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson