[Perdogg]

I think most voters are afraid to tell their true opinions about Obama.

[Paladin2]

Because Karl Rove.

[AFreeBird]

And just where is the article titled: “Why any sane human cannot trust a democrat - on ANYTHING - EVER!”

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Why don’t Americans trust Republicans on foreign policy?

Because the RATagandists constantly ridicule and berate them, and present their drivel as professional unbiased reporting.

[sten]

NBC poll will say whatever NBC and the left wants it to say.

Anyone that thinks otherwise is either complicit or stupid

[kingu]

What's surprising here? ‘Republican presidential nominees’ were Mitt Romney and John McCain. Does anyone honestly believe that either of those two would have done all that much better of a job picking secretary of states than Obama’s buffoons of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry?

The people are making their voices known based upon what has recently been presented to them. This isn't something to ‘worry’ most conservatives, it should send shivers of fear into the GOPe that people think their candidates weren't even up to Obama’s par.

[DoughtyOne]

I don’t think you have a highly visible Republican standing up and explaining what is wrong with Obama’s plan.

No plan at all is better than his plan.

Tell the American people and explain why.

Then take out Iran’s nuclear plants.

If it takes boots on the ground, then put in a fresh supply of boots.

[RedStateRocker]

Two words:
“Nation Building”
Even a lot of Dems were smart enough to see it was a stupid idea.

[Alberta's Child]

Simple answer: George W. Bush destroyed any credibility the Republican Party ever had on matters of foreign policy.

"Islam is a religion of peace." -- President George W. Bush

That will go down as one of the most idiotic things ever uttered by a U.S. president.

[Usagi_yo]

I don’t limit my distrust to foreign policy.

[vbmoneyspender]

I have a more important question. Why did a majority of Americans vote to elect Obama twice as President?

[WilliamIII]

bombing a country is not a tactic of war and won’t lead to a big war?

I wonder if that’s what the Japanese generals thought when they decided to take out our fleet at Pearl Harbor

[donna]

Because the elites think they can bring American democracy to all the Muslim countries if we spend enough money.

And, it's not elite sons losing their lives which as of now was for nothing.

American democracy was built on Christian values - thus we all know in our hearts that the elite foreign policy (Dem or Rep) is a joke and is mostly about follow the money.

[lavaroise]

It is the way the question is phased, about getting agreement, that is.

If it was about getting Iran to toe the line, it would be republican.

It is how they manipulate things to make people believe Obama is netter for the economy etc...

[Huskerfan44]

Can kicking has a 0% probability of success.

[al_c]

Obama hates one of our long time allies, negotiates with terrorists and trades 5 of them for one deserter, then negotiates with the Cubans, also wanted to fund ISIS against Syria ... yeah, let’s trust him with foreign policy. Bunch of blind idiots, I tell ya.

[sickoflibs]

Easy, that would GWB, Cheney, Powell, Rice and Rummy.

[Nuc 1.1]

Democrats have sabotaged every conflict we have been in since WWII consistently siding with America's enemies. It is what marxist’s do. The public is led to conclude that fighting wars are not worth it. One step away from concluding that fighting for your freedom is not worth it. So... why is anyone surprised when the very people who hate America, democrats, side with America's enemies.

[TBP]

Because Republicans try to downplay the differences.

[CyberAnt]

BTTT