Florida Set To Repeal 38-year-old Ban On Gay Adoption

Washington Times ^ | April 8, 2015 | Gary Fineout

[Iron Munro]

Florida’s nearly 40-year-old ban on gay adoption - which hasn’t been enforced for the past five years - is about to be tossed out by the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature.

But it’s not going without a fierce debate, including whether the state should adopt a separate law that would let private agencies use religious or moral grounds to turn away gay couples seeking to adopt children.

Some Republicans say this “conscience” law is needed to ensure that faith-based organizations handling adoptions will keep offering their services, but other legislators have compared the measure to Indiana’s religious objections law and said it would encourage discrimination against gay couples.

Both the House and Senate spent hours on Wednesday debating the state’s existing ban - and what will happen if it is permanently removed from law.

Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, defended the decision to jettison the gay adoption ban and called it a relic of another time that is now meaningless since an appeals court declared the law unconstitutional in 2010.

“We don’t need to turn the social clock in this state back to 1977,” said Gaetz, who is sponsoring the adoption bill.

Sen. Kelli Stargel, R-Lakeland, tried unsuccessfully to persuade other senators to keep the ban on the books. Stargel argued that getting rid of the ban could lead faith-based organizations to leave the state.

“I’m not going to let something leave this chamber and go to the governor that I think is the wrong policy for the state of Florida,” said Stargel.

The Florida Senate on Wednesday gave tentative approval to the bill (HB 7013) that eliminates the ban.

But after an outcry from conservative groups over the demise of the ban, House Republicans have agreed to push forward a separate bill that would “shield” religious organizations

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Florida Set To Repeal 38-year-old Ban On Gay Faggot Child Molester Adoption

[omni-scientist]

As an unconstitutional law I'm not sure what purpose having it on the books serves.

DEFIANCE

[Theodore R.]

They also want these children for the tax exemptions.

[Pollster1]

They also want these children for the tax exemptions.

That would be a disappointing reason for wanting an adopted child, but I suspect the real reason for these fake couples wanting to look after young boys is often far worse than mere financial incentives. The tax exemption is in most cases far less than the cost of raising a child.