Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump's Glitz vs. Santorum's Substance
The Iowa Republican ^ | 4/9/2015 | Craig Robinson

Posted on 04/09/2015 2:59:38 AM PDT by iowamark

One candidate flew to Des Moines on a Boeing 757, a $100 million private jet with gold plated seat-belt buckles. The other took a cab from O’Hare airport in Chicago to Midway to catch a Southwest flight to make it to Des Moines for his planned appearances. Donald Trump and Rick Santorum both spent the better part of the day in central Iowa yesterday, but their visits couldn’t have been more different.

Trump was treated like the celebrity that he is, with people he came in contact with stopping to get their “selfie” taken with him, and yes, that even goes for some people in the media. Trump had a full itinerary on Wednesday. The morning began with a press conference aboard his private jet, followed by an event at Simpson College that was attended by over 500 people.

In the afternoon, he would visit with both Republican caucuses in the statehouse and headline two private fundraisers in Ankeny. Despite the fundraising events being only a quarter mile apart, over 250 people turned out for a fundraiser for State Senator Jack Whitver, and another 100 or so turned out for the Polk County Republican Party.

What Trump provided with glitz and swagger, Santorum countered with substance. At a luncheon with about 50 people at the Bull Moose Club, Santorum spent considerable time talking about foreign policy issues but also touched on rebuilding the middle class and commented on the religious liberty debate that gripped the nation last week.

Santorum also met with a group of Des Moines labor leaders and, like Trump, he also visited the State Capitol to meet with Republican lawmakers. Wednesday night, Santorum spoke at the Dallas County GOP’s speaker’s series before holding a book signing for his latest book, “Bella’s Gift,” the story of the Santorum’s seven-year old daughter who wasn’t expected to live because she has Trisomy 18.

At Trump’s morning press conference, I asked him what would be the top three agenda items of a Trump administration. He answer was 1) stop nuclear proliferation, 2) repeal Obamacare and replace it with something better, and 3) build a strong military while also making sure our veterans get what they deserve. At the three Trump events I attended throughout the day, Trump’s policy proposals were pretty much inline with those of most other GOP candidates, but he never really provided any depth or details.

Santorum admitted in his remarks that he could speak about Iran for hours, and to those in attendance, it was abundantly clear that he wasn’t exaggerating. Santorum explained that the biggest difference between the 2012 and 2016 campaigns is national security. “The last time around, there were 23 debates, I participated in 22 of them, and there was one debate on national security,” Santorum said.

Santorum then reminded the audience that Republicans have lost five of the past six presidential elections, the only one in which they won the popular vote was in 2004, which was the last election where foreign policy was on the national stage.

Santorum not only talked at length about Iran, but also about the growing foreign policy problems in Central America. “The only two countries that we have a better relationship with now than when Barak Obama came into office are Cuba and Iran,” said Santorum. “Both of those countries are doing horrible things in their regions of the world,” he added.

The State Department on Wednesday requested that Cuba be removed from the United States’ terrorism list, a move that the Obama Administration will easily welcome as they wish to normalize relations with the communist dictatorship.

Santorum explained, “Cuba used to not be allowed to participate in the Organization of America States because they were a dictatorship.” Santorum also claimed that Castro has helped facilitate other dictatorships in the region. “This is a disaster for us economically because we are losing our influence in a part of the world where we had tremendous trade with Central and South America. That’s being eroded because of the Bolivarian Revolution and the implant of China and other countries in that region that are anti-American,” Santorum added.

The contrast between Trump and Santorum couldn’t have been more noticeable. While Santorum didn’t draw the attention that Trump did, those who did get a chance to listen to him came away impressed. Donald Trump’s answers to questions are what you would expect to hear on radio and TV interviews, but Santorum’s substance and knowledge on critical subjects is what you want in a leader.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: santorum; trump
A man of character contrasted with a man who is a character.
1 posted on 04/09/2015 2:59:38 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Get the alcohol outta our gas.....


2 posted on 04/09/2015 3:01:03 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Santorum has shown he will sell out to the political establishment.


3 posted on 04/09/2015 3:02:24 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Neither of them flutters my putter.


4 posted on 04/09/2015 3:16:54 AM PDT by mylife ("The roar of the masses could be farts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Rick is running the race a mile behind the leaders and has no chance of catching up. He doesn't have current relevance in politics. He's a guy who lost years ago and should join a news channel as a commentator.
5 posted on 04/09/2015 3:21:37 AM PDT by Clean_Sweep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
A rug vs a substance?

Both of these are has-beens!

We need new blood. Not the next in line.

6 posted on 04/09/2015 3:22:00 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“Neither of them flutters my putter.”

Agree. I’m sick of both of them and their perpetual “I’m thinking about running” prognostications. Just go away I say.


7 posted on 04/09/2015 3:23:15 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“Neither of them flutters my putter.”

Agree. I’m sick of both of them and their perpetual “I’m thinking about running” prognostications. Just go away I say.


8 posted on 04/09/2015 3:42:10 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Nice writeup. I would like to see more of our candidates able to speak knowledgably like Santorum on foreign policy issues.


9 posted on 04/09/2015 3:55:42 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clean_Sweep

No...I think campaigning, if only to keep issues on the forefront IS valuable. Personally, I’d like to see Justice Santorum...Secretary of Energy Palin; Dr. Ben Carson in charge of dismantling ObamaCare.

The Right has a solid cast of learned candidates...the next President (Cruz2016!) should utilize them.


10 posted on 04/09/2015 4:10:06 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Could you be a wee bit more specific?
Neither has a chance.
Both would love to be spoilers.
Both are running to sweeten their book/media deals.
If it weren’t for the dead weasels artfully hot glued to Trump’s head, it would be really hard to tell them apart.


11 posted on 04/09/2015 4:15:38 AM PDT by mountainbunny (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens ~ J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I’d like to say people couldn’t possibly dumb enough to support trump, but we’ve seen them steal the last two residential elections.


12 posted on 04/09/2015 4:29:08 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Trump has a big mouth and that always adds something to the mix (of course he has no chance except to add to the discussion of issues).

Santorum just has no chance.

13 posted on 04/09/2015 4:53:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Santorum had his chance. He blew it.


14 posted on 04/09/2015 4:59:54 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

I don’t have anything agains’t Rick Santoroum but when he was a Senator he embraced all the big govt legislation. He adds to the conversation but I don’t want him for President.


15 posted on 04/09/2015 8:02:01 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Get the alcohol outta our gas.....

I don't mind it, as long as I have the choice.

And right now, E85 is cheap enough that I'm using it.

16 posted on 04/09/2015 2:12:39 PM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson