Replies

And no one is saying an LGBT can’t order a simple cake, cupcakes or cookies.

Their personal rights, however, end at the infrimgement of my rights, which are constitutionally spelled out and protected.

Gays are also covered in the Freedom of Religion clause.

Now, what if 7 people came in under the auspice of marrying each other in a polygamous union?

Hey, what if a NAMBLA member came in and simply desired a cake with the words “I like young boys”?

What of the brother and sister entering into a union and insisting they have the right to enter into a union, as well the expectation that a baker should be compelled to put on their cake expressions such as “Thanks mom and dad. We’re keeping it in the family”.

It quickly gets worse from there.

The only real solution, if it is truly a religious issue, is for Religious people, going forward, to just not enter into a grant of license from the state.

You would lose a good many protections under the law but, if you truly desire to be with each other for the rest of your lives then getting married in a church blessed ceremony shouldn’t be a bar.

Besides, there are contracts such as pre-nups that spell out all kinds of things such as marital expectations and even what happens if this union fails.

Personally, I think everyone should have to enter into a pre-nup so they understand what they are getting into and discuss items of importance.

If the state insists on being in the business of marriage and defining whst a union may be and if, that sort of thing bothers you, don’t participate in the scam instigated by the minority.