Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama admits Iran nuclear deal only delays inevitable, leaves problem for future presidents
FoxNews.com ^ | April 07, 2015

Posted on 04/07/2015 6:41:16 AM PDT by SJackson

President Obama admitted Tuesday in a broadcast interview that his nuclear agreement with Iran only delays Tehran from eventually acquiring a weapon, which could come immediately after Year 13 of the agreement -- leaving the problem for future presidents.

Obama made the comments about Tehran's so-called "breakout time" in an interview with NPR News that aired Tuesday morning. The president was attempting to answer the charge that the deal framework agreed upon by the U.S., Iran, and five other nations last week fails to eliminate the risk of Iran getting a nuclear weapon because it allows Tehran to keep enriching uranium.

Obama said that Iran would be capped for a decade at 300 kilograms of uranium -- not enough to convert to a stockpile of weapons-grade material.

"What is a more relevant fear would be that in Year 13, 14, 15, they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero," Obama said.

The stark admission -- after his energy secretary even claimed the deal was a "forever agreement" -- came as the president seeks to quiet a growing chorus questioning whether the deal he and world leaders have negotiated merely delays the certainty of a nuclear-armed Iran. Obama has insisted confidently that Iran will not get a nuclear weapon on his watch, which ends in roughly 20 months, but has made no similar assurances about his successors.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aprilfoolsirandeal; aprilfoolstrandeal; nonukesonmywatch; obamaisrael

1 posted on 04/07/2015 6:41:16 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

"The option of a future president to take action if in fact they try to obtain a nuclear weapon is undiminished," Obama said.

Guess that's an admission that foreign policy is beyond his pay grade.

2 posted on 04/07/2015 6:42:53 AM PDT by SJackson (I used to eat a lot of natural foods until I learned that most people die of natural causes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
leaves problem for future presidents

...leaves problem for the American citizen

3 posted on 04/07/2015 6:44:18 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

There is a solution that leads to a 1000 year break-out time. Ø’s quest for a 3month to 12month breakout, will inevitably lead to that solution. There are unintended consequences to everything Ø does.


4 posted on 04/07/2015 6:46:17 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This is what passes for leadership from a community organizer. Its good that Obama removed Churchill’s bust from the Oval office. It would have walked out on its own if it could.


5 posted on 04/07/2015 6:48:20 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

“Its good that Obama removed Churchill’s bust from the Oval office. It would have walked out on its own if it could.”

Do we have to take his word on the manner of its removal?


6 posted on 04/07/2015 6:57:27 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

bookmark


7 posted on 04/07/2015 6:59:54 AM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Guess that’s an admission that foreign policy is beyond his pay grade.

This POS is only capable of voting “present”.


8 posted on 04/07/2015 7:26:37 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What he is actually saying is that this deal allows them to develop the capacity to produce large amounts of fissile material, and that the only thing stopping them from using this capacity is their adherence to the deals caps. Essentially, he is admitting that ‘break out time’ is whenever they decide to stop following the deal.


9 posted on 04/07/2015 7:38:55 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Obama Doctrine ,Lie ,Cheat and Delay until it’s too Late


10 posted on 04/07/2015 8:31:38 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Mr. Obama declares: "It is peace for our time."

Our children will pay a terrible price for Obama's appeasement.

11 posted on 04/07/2015 11:13:46 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson