The Columbia Journalism Report is quite detailed and makes interesting reading.
They question everything and ask all the right questions.
Except
They never once question the phenomenon of organized, Federally required and Federally-funded groups of “survivors”, membership in which is attained by unsupported oral statements, and carries with it, among other things, lots of personal attention and relief from some of the less desirable aspects of highly competitive college life.
The phenomenon of being a self-declared “survivor of sexual assault” is a complete novelty, not subject to reality testing or even to dispute. There are now many examples that have made their way into the media (and, therefore, presumably many more that have not) wherein the accused male student has been acquitted in a court, or states have declined to prosecute, or even (in the Columbia University mattress girl case) where the local kangaroo court has found the male student innocent, wherein the constant slander against the accused and support for the “survivor” continue.
THAT is the real cause of the Rolling Stone contretemps. It’s a shame that the report did not even mention it.
Another LIE.
Like the Lena Dunham book description of her rape by the “campus Republican”? (she is a pathetic useful ComDem idiot)
In that case someone she admits did not rape her, was injured and had to pay lawyers to defend himself. Like this one, her story was a total fabrication.
Source of this insanity is the ComDem Party. They use it to stir up their base of lemming to follow them into the abyss.