I thought we had one in all states and territories of the USA, it’s called the 1st amendment. Why do we need more laws to enforce it?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
We're gonn'a get all MORE jumbled up in wordy word words.
... and ten years from now black cars will be unconstitutional because of the first ammendment
Rasmussen Report has a poll on the Indiana RFRA lynch mob. 53% oppose Indiana’s 1st version of RFRA. 35% support it. Considering the lies and grossly one-sided converage, plus Pence looking like he had a gun to his head, that is not too bad. For AZ last year, Rasmussen had 66% oppose the AZ religious freedom bill and 20% favor it. Interestingly, Rasmussen has people who followed the news coverage of IN very closely to be in slightly in favor of it. People who did follow the subject very closely opposed the bill.
But all is not lost. Seventy percent (70%) still agree that a Christian wedding photographer who has deeply held religious beliefs opposing same-sex marriage has the right to turn down working a job at such a wedding.
Meaning we really someone who can articulate the subject well.
And 100% of Scott-less Rasmussen Reports oppose such a law.
What this means is that our CommieMSM has thoroughly confused the issue to the point that it is no longer understood.
AND THAT WAS THEIR INTENT ALL ALONG!
The news coverage of IN have given RFRAs a bad name. Every time a state RFRA bill is proposed in a state, its going to be examined more closely by the media.
What is the recommendation for states that want to have RFRAs. Easy: use language identical to federal RFRA.
Here in New York I don’t want anything but to leave for somewhere that is still in the United States Of America.
It will be easier to persecute moslems without it.
Absolutely.
I wonder how many voters understand just what these religious freedom laws are.
As I understand it, they do not discriminate against anyone personally. They do business with you when you enter the store. They do discriminate against events such as homosexual marriages.
Such a law is good and proper.