Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ISRAEL WARNS OF ‘MILITARY OPTION’ AS IRAN TALKS DRAG ON
Breitbart National Security ^ | 2 Apr 2015 | by JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 04/02/2015 9:01:56 AM PDT by Resettozero

As talks over a nuclear deal with Iran continued past self-imposed deadlines, Israel’s intelligence minister has warned that the military option is on the table–and noted that Israel does not need U.S. cooperation to carry out a pre-emptive strike.

According to the Times of Israel, Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz told Israel Radio Thursday: “…if we have no choice we have no choice… the military option is on the table.” He reminded listeners that Israel had attacked Saddam Hussein’s Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981 without help from then-President Ronald Reagan (who actually condemned the attack).

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Egypt; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; Syria
KEYWORDS: egypt; iran; iraniannukes; israel; israeldefense; israeliran; nucleariran; obamasfault; russia; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: zot

Yes. It tends to come up in situations like this one developing.

I prefer the Jesus Option but the Israelis still disagree.


21 posted on 04/02/2015 10:18:53 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Just a thought I have had for a while that might be worth sharing with other like minded readers who might be in position to perhaps make some use of it, Israel in particular.

Over the years the development of MOABs have been increasing in size hoping to be able to destroy ever deeper and more fortified bunkers. With GPS being what it is today I do not understand why they haven’t gone a different route, what I would call the ‘Jackhammer” approach of having a string of super hardened deep penetrating GPS guided bombs very accurately hitting a target only seconds behind one another...followed by a MOAB whose effect would the be dramatically improved due to it’s now going off deep inside the pocket created by the slightly earlier Jackhammer bombs.


22 posted on 04/02/2015 10:28:02 AM PDT by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

yawn...............

get on with it already.


23 posted on 04/02/2015 10:42:59 AM PDT by utax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zot

The more I think about your post, the more I suspect Iran, in quick order, could well manipulate events that would simulate Israel taking the Samson Option, still blaming Israel for it all.


24 posted on 04/02/2015 10:53:28 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

“.....There is no deal beneficial to the USA on the table...”

Or the entire Western world for that matter. And there NEVER WILL BE. When we finally get an American President in the White Hut, he has an issue here to address big time to clean this disastrous mess up.


25 posted on 04/02/2015 11:25:54 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

I think Iran might use its first atomic bomb on Israel, and that would trigger immediate retaliation on Iran if not the full Samson Option.


26 posted on 04/02/2015 12:41:55 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson