Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Working Man
The problem is, as I see it .. there ARE laws on the books ... right or wrong, they ARE laws and the court has the right and the position to try a defendent accused of violating the law.

It doesn't make it right and it certainly eliminates any humanity from 'the law' .. but that's the problem

Does anyone know the outcome of this trial ?

33 posted on 03/31/2015 5:52:17 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

In post #24 the freeper posted “And he was convicted!”


36 posted on 03/31/2015 5:53:40 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

see post 24 for the outcome of the trial - he was convicted!


38 posted on 03/31/2015 5:54:24 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: knarf; All

Further down in the article:
So what’s next? Vaduva has filed a Motion To Vacate Verdict based on this insane, and ignorant abuse of the English language by the judge and prosecutor.

Images of his arguments....

We couldn’t agree more. If you haven’t guessed it yet, this is not going away. This case is headed to the federal courts. On Tuesday the 31st, the court plans to sentence Virgil to 30 days in jail for his crime of raising money for charity. Help us SPREAD THE WORD so this ridiculous “Gummo” Xenia Court doesn’t get away with this perverse form of “justice.”


40 posted on 03/31/2015 5:57:09 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

Perhaps you meant to post to someone else?

My post that you responded to was:

“The Stupid is really strong with this Judge. Her VERY position is the result of the constitution she casually tosses out of her courtroom.

That NEEDS to be pointed out to her firmly.... VERY Firmly.”

The judge’s position I was referring to was her position as a JUDGE. A constitutionally created position, either Federal or State. So when she threw the First amendment out the door she opened the door for her position as a judge to also be thrown out.

I believe you just can’t pick and choose what amendments you care to follow. Follow all or none. But be aware when you choose to follow none then the protections and guarantees in the Constitution shouldn’t apply to you either.

Although today’s reality says if you are a Democrat or a politician then the law doesn’t apply to you. Perhaps the Judicial branch thinks the same? And then what happens when the Bureaucracy claims the same ‘privilege’?

SHTF/CWII has many potential fathers... This path is just one of them.


43 posted on 03/31/2015 6:02:17 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson