Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gideon7

If there is already a high tide, nine more feet would be disaster.


15 posted on 03/29/2015 5:38:47 PM PDT by jonrick46 (America's real drug problem: other people's money (the Commutist's opium addiction).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46

Looks like roughly halfway between high and low tide.

http://www.tide-forecast.com/locations/Port-Moresby-Papua-New-Guinea/tides/latest


20 posted on 03/29/2015 5:44:52 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

A lot of it really depends on how much water is in the wave.

Nine feet is a lot, but if it’s nine feet high, and a mile thick moving at 30mph, then that would be a calamity.

A lot of the damage caused by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was by a wave with only a foot or so in height at landfall, but it kept coming, and coming, ... and pushing objects into other objects, creating sharp edge debris, etc., and then to pull all that crap back when the wave receded.

Throw in the undermining structures not built to withstand rushing waters, and you get the picture with even a larger wave.


24 posted on 03/29/2015 5:52:57 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson