I already said that legitimate computer software experts have made exact replicas of the whitehouse.gov pdf image using a standard workflow.
If there was ever to be a formal adversarial proceeding about the whitehouse.gov pdf image, it would pit one group of software reprographics experts against another.
Here’s the analysis of the replicated workflow using a Xerox Workcentre:
The existence of a single JPEG layer (color) containing mostly the background and multiple monochrome bit masks containing mostly text (MRC Compression).
A. The ability to open the document in Adobe Illustrator and move around objects separately.
B. Separate monochrome layers for the date stamp and Alvin Onaka’s seal.
C. Existence of a background color layer at 150 ppi resolution and monochrome layers at 300 ppi.
D. Scaling of the layers (48% and 24%).
Images are rotated 90 degrees clockwise. Xerox, WH LFBC
The creation of pixel for pixel identical letters and shapes via JBIG2
White border recreated
Replication of the double clipping mask
White holes in the background layer where text was lifted (x-ray).
The PDF contains an embedded JPEG which contains a JPEG comment ‘YCbCr’
The PDF contains an embedded JPEG which contains identical quantization matrices.
The alignment of two sides of the foreground images with 8 bit boundaries in a 300 ppi layer.
The alignment of two sides of the foreground images touching the internal objects.
Speckled blocks
Producer, Creator
Raw PDF data matches.
Halos created
Why are there typefaces from six different makes of typewriter?
You’re telling me that someone put a sheet of paper in a scanner, pushed the “Scan” button, and a PDF file was instantly created with all those anomalous characteristics?
B. as in B. S. as in S.
And why does the “birth certificate” bear the typefaces of six different typewriters?