[Nero Germanicus]

So let me get this straight. When there is an original document, you want to focus on scanned digital images of the original document?
Why?
I haven’t evaded anything. I’ve addressed the core issues directly. If anyone still needs to verify where and when Barack Obama was born, more than seven years into his terms in office, convince a judge, any judge, to issue a court order for inspection of the vault edition Certificate of Live Birth and compare it to what it says on the (allegedly forged) whitehouse.gov image. Alternatively or additionally, a congressional subpoena would also allow for inspection of the original, hard copy, vault edition birth certificate.

[Arthur McGowan]

There is no original document that was “scanned” to generate the pathetic, forged PDF image.

THERE IS NO SUCH PIECE OF PAPER, because scanning a piece of paper does not result in the layers, the varieties of resolution, the varieties of bit depth, the mixture of color and monochrome elements, and the multiple typewriter typefaces. (Unless you believe that a nurse or clerk went dashing from typewriter to typewriter to fill out the form.)

[Arthur McGowan]

So let me get this straight. When there is an original document, you want to focus on scanned digital images of the original document?

In case I haven't been clear: There is no original document. No piece of paper exists. No piece of paper was put in a scanner to generate the "birth certificate" purportedly shown in the PDF image.