Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood Stars Condemn Mike Pence For Signing Religious Objections Bill (Lt. Sulu Boycotts Indiana)
Bretibart ^

Posted on 03/27/2015 2:00:50 PM PDT by drewh

A number of Hollywood celebrities have taken aim at Indiana Gov. Mike Pence after the governor signed a religious objections bill into state law on Thursday.

Miley Cyrus, Ashton Kutcher, screenwriter Dustin Lance Black, and Broadway star Audra McDonald were among those who took to social media Thursday to decry Gov. Pence’s signing of Senate Bill 101, which forbids both the state and federal government from limiting a persons’ ability to exercise their religion. Critics say the law will allow Indiana businesses to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.

“You’re an a**hole @govpenceIN,” Miley Cyrus wrote on Instagram Thursday. “The only place that has more idiots that [sic] Instagram is in politics.”

“Indiana are you also going to allow Christian establishments to ban Jews from coming in?” tweeted Ashton Kutcher. “Or vice versa? Religious freedom??? #OUTRAGE.”

Legendary Star Trek actor George Takei had promised to boycott Indiana if the law passed, and urged his online followers to avoid attending video game convention GenCon, the largest annual convention in the state.

“To the governor and to the legislators in Indiana who support this backward-looking and divisive bill, I say to you this: If it goes into effect, Indiana will be marked as a state where certain people are not welcome, and so we will not visit,” Takei wrote in a Facebook post on Tuesday. “We will not spend. And we will not attend events, including GenCon, the world’s largest gaming convention, held in Indianapolis each year. Many fans here are gamers, Governor Pence, and we will demand the convention move out of your state.”

The convention is reportedly under contract to remain in Indiana until 2020, and GenCon spokeswoman told the Indianapolis Star that it will honor its contract. However, she said the law’s passage will “factor into future decisions.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: california; homosexualagenda; indiana; mikepence; rfra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: nascarnation; All
This 10th Amendment-protected Indiana Religious Freedom Act is arguably a litmus test as to who has read the Constitution and who hasn’t.

It turns out the Constitution’s Equal Protections Clause (14A), which activist judges and state officials are twisting to promote constitutionally unprotected gay agenda issues like gay marriage to bully Christians, is found is the same section of the 14th Amendment which prohibits the states from making laws / policies which unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights, such as 1st Amendment-protected religious expression.

14th Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws [emphasis added].

The states who have bullied Christians over gay issues have violated the 14th Amendment imo.

Note that the Religious Freedom Act not only protects religious expression, but it also makes it more difficult for Indiana state officials to unthinkingly violate 14A like the pro-gay activist states have.

61 posted on 03/27/2015 4:06:41 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh
This law purportedly would allow Christian owned businesses not to cater to homosexuals, or to anyone else they find objectionable. The consequence? Some Christian bakers will have the right not to make wedding cakes for homosexual couples.

Meanwhile, Arab and African countries stone, behead, and burn people to death for homosexual acts. yet homosexual activists seem to direct all of their venom towards white conservative Christians.

You'd think that being burned to death would be a greater cause for outrage than being refused a cake, but what do I know?

62 posted on 03/27/2015 4:39:16 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Miley Cyrus brings to mind the term “trailer trash.”


63 posted on 03/27/2015 5:21:47 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Liberals screech when govt gets involved in their lives, and also in the case like this, when it gets out of peoples’ lives.

Liberals are just lawless implacable people.


64 posted on 03/27/2015 5:57:39 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Rush Limbaugh hired Elton John to preform at Rush’ wedding..

its was Rush choice to hire , it was Elton Johns choice to accept the job

Does any one content John should of been required by law to accept the job if he objected to working for Rush?

65 posted on 03/27/2015 6:22:20 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

A liberal would say no because Elton is a liberal.

A conservative would say no because they believe Elton has freedom of association and a right to refuse service to someone they don’t want to work for.


66 posted on 03/27/2015 6:30:52 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

Unless the Sangria is Sangria Senioral, Mexican soft drink that is alcohol free, yet tastes like red wine.


67 posted on 03/27/2015 6:47:05 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

Yeah, but The Adventures of Superman and Emergency! are a little more enjoyable to me.


68 posted on 03/27/2015 6:50:57 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

It’s an understatement to say just killed. It’s complete Open Season on Homosexuals in the Middle East, including mob justice. Whereas if I did the same thing here in the U.S., I would be charged with murder and prosecuted with murder.


69 posted on 03/27/2015 6:55:00 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

So how is it different if a Christian singer does not want to preform at a Gay “marriage”?..... its not different


70 posted on 03/27/2015 7:00:12 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
People are missing a point... the performer say they are boycotting providing services in the state because the state because the state allows people boycott providing services to gay marriages on religious grounds.

So the performer are beings hypocrites because they say you should not allow to not provide a service you offer on any grounds

Even the Federal government acknowledges religious grounds of conscientious objectors for things like military drafts

71 posted on 03/27/2015 7:12:26 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
People are missing a point... the performers are saying they are boycotting providing services in the state...because the state allows people to boycott providing services to gay marriages on religious grounds.

So the performer are beings hypocrites because they are saying you should not be allowed to not provide a service you offer on ANY grounds

Even the Federal government acknowledges religious grounds of conscientious objectors for things like military drafts

72 posted on 03/27/2015 7:15:08 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Don’t worry they keeping that on I don’t think their time change on that so far April schedule is saying Superman and Emergency still there


73 posted on 03/27/2015 7:15:50 PM PDT by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

They need to use this picture whenever they publish stories about Indiana’s religious freedom bill.


74 posted on 03/27/2015 9:36:22 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’s a perfect picture.


75 posted on 03/27/2015 9:42:31 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

The photo includes nuns, monks, a priest & a rabbi.

Somebody’s bound to complain about the lack of inclusiveness.


76 posted on 03/28/2015 6:41:01 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
It’s an understatement to say just killed. It’s complete Open Season on Homosexuals in the Middle East, including mob justice. Whereas if I did the same thing here in the U.S., I would be charged with murder and prosecuted with murder.

Yet homosexual activists hate the United States but love the "oppressed" peoples of Africa and the Middle East. I guess being denied a wedding cake is so much worse than being burned alive or stoned to death. You also never heard any homosexual activist ever complain about Maoist China, Communist Russia, or Castro's Cuba where (at least until recently) homos were rounded up in detention camps. Once again, first things first, being made fun of or denied services at a private business is obviously much more "oppressive" than being put into a concentration camp.

77 posted on 03/28/2015 4:03:21 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
Next great vacation spot!

Pardon me for asking...but WHY? Besides the Indianapolis 500 and the NASCAR at the Brickyard...what does Indiana have that is worth visiting?

Perhaps some Indiana FReepers can answer this for me. Only rode through there once in 1977, on a Greyhound bus, and never left the Indiana Turnpike.

78 posted on 03/28/2015 4:12:41 PM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Then you were within a thousand yards of some of the most beautiful fresh water lakes in the US.

I have a cottage in Indiana.....one hour door to door.


79 posted on 03/28/2015 4:17:20 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

PS....the best part about rural Ind.....is that the amish are really amish....


80 posted on 03/28/2015 4:19:02 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson