The NY Times should lead by example and shut down.
Sounds like I need a new t-shirt declaring that I am a perpetuator and denier. A twofer.
Global Warming presents some serious and immediate dangers to civilization and those perils are entirely the political uses of the hoax to try for total power everywhere and total impoverishment of the bulk of the world’s people.
Journalists care about the truththats my only care in life, to find the truth, Gillis said. To act as if the evidence is half and half is to tell a lie. I refuse to perpetuate that lie.”
Old school journalists may have cared about the truth, but today’s journ-o-lists of the Ministry of Propaganda only cares about the agenda. Lies to further the agenda are considered truth by them.
It’s “a lie” to report OPINION as fact.
Soon, the libs in power will say that presenting balance warrants a death sentence. They're not interested in balance, they're not interested in science, they're only interested in getting their way even if they need to assault the rest of us.
One problem now, is that if Global Warming is ever conclusively demonstrated to be false (by, for example, global temperatures starting a declining trend), then all the hysterical supporters will look like complete idiots. This means that they will have an incentive to double down and suppress any contrary evidence.
Um, the IPCC and the other NGOs openly admit this.
HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
'Facade' is right... but I don't think he knows what that word means.
The bulb burns brightest before it burns out
This is much like the abortion wars: what term you use signals what side you are on, Gillis said, adding that its necessary for reporters to maintain a facade of impartiality.
Gillis told students he liked to use the word deniers for people who oppose climate science, and that these people should never be called skeptics.
Leftists aren't confused.
Leftists are the enemies of humanity.
They don't want to "win."
They want everyone dead.
“Stop quoting Galileo! He is wrong! The Earth is the center of the universe!”
SOP for the liberal agenda; deny the validity of any POV that differs from yours w/o regard to facts or logic.
Gillis should explain to the students how buying Carbon Credits from billionaires like Al Gore helps stop Global Warming and holds back the rise of the seas.
They probably aren’t educated enough to understand such a nuanced concept without an explanation from someone with an in depth understanding of the issue - someone like Gillis.
It's sort've like Neil deGrasse Tyson who popped off yesterday abut the stupidity of AGW "deniers." I have the same question for him: what gives an astrophysicist/cosmologist the specific background to comment authoritatively on Earth's climate? He's got his elitist head up his Black Hole (I am speaking astronomically, not racially). If I want to know what's happened to Earth's climate in the past I go to historical geologists -- who, by the way, blow the AGW nonsense to smithereens. But that's real science, not Gorebull/U.N. propaganda.
Duh. UN employees themselves have admitted climate change is a proxy for socialism.