Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squantos

Very nice! I could go for a AR rifle in that caliber.

Found an article touting the usefulness of the .243 as a service round.

http://www.chuckhawks.com/243_service_rifle.htm


12 posted on 03/24/2015 7:13:38 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Redcitizen

Weight reduction and reliability, performance and a 1000 yard max effective range, common caliber for a squad automatic weapon.....whats not to like....:o)

I love the 243 .....

Stay Safe , thanks for the link.


14 posted on 03/24/2015 7:21:31 PM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen

Trying hard to remember, but i think the Brits wanted something like that rather than the 5.56 but the US steamrolled them with the tiny cartridge. Might not have been .243, but was bigger than .223.


17 posted on 03/24/2015 7:32:50 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Redcitizen
"Found an article touting the usefulness of the .243 as a service round."

I always thought that for a combination of weight and punch, the .250 Savage would be a decent service round. The commercial loadings don't take full advantage of the cartridge and are watered down a bit to accommodate some of the older model Savage 99s floating around out there, but with a higher pressured loading it would make a nice replacement for the 5.56.

19 posted on 03/24/2015 7:40:56 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson