Then get back to me. OR... even better...
Posted on 03/23/2015 2:06:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Then get back to me. OR... even better...
He’s already getting a ton of heat from the libs. I’ve seen countless postings already on Huffington about his eligibility. He’s going to have to hold a press conference and kill this off.
Global Warming all the way! What does it mean?!?
Bwahahaha!
Really? You don’t get it? Cruz is staking his position because, although you’d never hear it from the media, most Americans think “climate change” is a crock. Appealing to the majority can be a really good strategy.
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz... blithely dismissing the Democratic governor as one of those "global warming alarmists" who relies on ridicule and insult. A [non-candidate Jerry] Brown campaign strategist shot back Monday that the "factually irrational" Cruz is apparently now determined to "stand out from a pack of troglodytes in the GOP race for the White House."
Republicans enlist manatee in bid to slow Obama carbon emissions regulations
Green movement calls Obama fracking rules a ‘giveaway’ to oil and gas industry
Global Warming on Free Republic
I’m sure they’re tickled pink.
Yes! Good one! To counter global warming one must increase the population of pirates!
On par with the Bortkiewicz study of the number of Prussian soldier deaths by horse kicks in the late 19th Century.
Global Warming is ultimately to be blamed on Ninjas for causing global Pirate depopulation... hence, Global Inferno.
Ninjas did it! Yes!
NINJAGO!!!!
... IMMA KEELHAUL ME SOME NINJAS!!!
He needs to go straight at them, it isn’t that the climate isn’t warming, it is it isn’t warming enough to validate the models of ca strophic man made warming.
The Entire Theory of Global Warming and the Economic Models the Fed use are incredibly similar. The biggest difference is the solutions being pushed/chosen.
True at earth's normal atmospheric pressures and temperatures. CO2 has a triple point as well, but would only be present high on a mountain in Antarctica if that. But the reason that CO2 has outsized importance for its concentration is water's triple point.
That is because CO2 is always there and water vapor condenses high up leading to net global cooling. The water cycle is part of earth's warming and cooling systems and CO2 has a mostly warming role.
Temperature did not cause the CO2 rise. It would have caused 5-10 ppm rise if mankind were not around. Instead we have a 120ppm rise and rising. Luckily although temperature rises cause small CO2 rises, CO2 rises don't do much to temperature. A modest rise of no concern to anyone, with predicted rises shown to be wrong year after year.
Sorry, it would have to be a low valley in Antarctica. TO reach the triple point for CO2 would require low temperature and high pressure.
Absolutely! Garbage in = garbage out!
I love your post.
The hilarious thing is that he believes this (or pretends to) because he thinks the Global Warming Scam is real!!!!
Jerry Brown is only fit to be an extra in a Cheech & Chong movie...
...if they ever make another one.
If Democrats were as smart as they think they are, this would be Jerry's only option in life other than a padded cell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.