Posted on 03/23/2015 8:36:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
He is as much a NBC of Cuba as he is the U.S.
“That ship has sailed.”
Not only has it sailed, its already in the New World, building colonies, drinking rum and cider, and the people are expanding westward.
That ship is VERY gone indeed.
Cruz is not a NBC
_________________________
So? How many lower and even Supreme Court decisions do you need to accept that the definition of a NBC is NOT what you, I or the Constitution thought it meant but what the Courts say it is.
Cruz is eligible.
The BIG question for all of the Republican candidates: If elected and given the fact of so much evidence, will you peruse criminal charges against Obama and his regime and resend every thing that Obama has done to include his two Supreme Court appointments while he was in the WH?
“The laws are on his side that he is. Anyone who doubts it, is living in their own fantasy.”
And Cruz actually is a constitutional lawyer. According to Dershowitz one of the brightest he’s ever seen. Not like an Obama EEOC kid pushed along and spit out the other end to a welfare lawyer job, and an adjunct lecturer until he had to surrender his law license.
I'm of the opinion the 2008 elections were engineered to erode the NBC requirement.
The whole issue is also muddied by the easy confusion of anchor-baby style naturalization and citizen by right of birth [NBC].
The NWO-types hate the NBC requirement because inherent and underlying that requirement is the assumption that nationality does matter, and that those born to a country have a greater chance of being loyal to that country than just anybody
.
His executive order on his first day as president, hiding his entire life history, is all the proof I need.
B U M P
That's a lie; those of us who were, were told to kindly shut up
or wait for the proper time to challenge it
or ignored or flatly dismissed.
The flat dismissal BTW is the favorite of the judiciary: nope, you don't have standing
is a convenient way to dodge the issue.
And your reply clearly illustrates why 'precedent' is terrible — just because the law was broken in the past doesn't make it a-ok to break it now.
Devil's advocate: Two wrongs DO make a right?
There are 5 different Citizenship terms used in the United States Constitution. See the first link below.
Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term natural born citizen to any other category than those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof.
Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same
"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.
A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789
The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law
Let me repeat...the NBC ship has sailed! Period.
Lib: “Ted Cruz isn’t qualified as a natural born citizen!”
Us: “After the left’s defense of Obama, the proper response to that line of argument is a simple ‘shut up’, or, if you persist, a punch in the mouth.”
As long as his mother was a U.S. citizen and resided in the U.S. for a minimum of five years after her fourteenth birthday before giving birth to him then he most certainly IS a NBC.
But by citing laws (passed by congress) one is relying on Congress’s power to create a uniform rule of naturalization, and if he is naturalized then he is not a NBC.
Which executive order was that?
Citizenship and “natural born” citizenship are not equivalents, but I’ve learned that this point is not worth contending.
Being born on territory of the U.S.A. is a requirement of eligibility to hold the office of President, irrespective of the nationality of one’s mother. My wife, born in the U.S.A., could legally run for and hold the office of President, although her mother never terminated her Norwegian citizenship or tried to become a U.S. citizen.
The prospective candidate’s natural born citizenship is the point; not the citizenship of his/her mother.
That being seemingly terminally incomprehensible to some, I give up.
That's a lie; those of us who were, were told to kindly shut up or wait for the proper time to challenge it or ignored or flatly dismissed.
Now that it's a white conservative in question is the "proper time", right?
Liberals won’t have to question Cruz’s natural-born citizen status. There are enough conservatives willing to do that for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.