Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Redistributing wealth may be all that staves off collapse
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | March 20, 2015 | Robert Reich

Posted on 03/22/2015 9:12:40 AM PDT by artichokegrower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: artichokegrower

Their logic is flawed. The redistributionist logic has always been flawed.

The rich can only make money off the poor if the poor have money. The rich have to compete with other rich in the marketplace, for the money of the poor. Stagnation and monopoly are naturally selected against. A dynamic market will always persist/evolve, so long as government stays out of it.


21 posted on 03/22/2015 9:29:49 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Ok...let’s start with the Clintons and Feinsteins!


22 posted on 03/22/2015 9:30:14 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

[T]he left really defines the word “rich” as “anyone with anything the government wants to take.” John F. Di Leo http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2014/12/josef-stalin-and-the-problem-of-political-opposition.html


23 posted on 03/22/2015 9:30:14 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

debt obligations for unfunded pension and benefits owed public service employees”

We called these SLAVE CONTRACTS when I was a kid!


24 posted on 03/22/2015 9:30:29 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Another stupid remark from Shorty.


25 posted on 03/22/2015 9:31:03 AM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Minolta and Canon didn’t have film as their primary product. They made cameras, and just switched from film to digital types.

Kodak’s main product just went away.


26 posted on 03/22/2015 9:32:05 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Fugi as well


27 posted on 03/22/2015 9:33:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I love how soo many songs from the 1960’s and 70’s are politically applicable today.

I admit that with a lot of the songs you may have to reorient your thinking and listen as if the artist’s are being sarcastic.


28 posted on 03/22/2015 9:34:45 AM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Reich is an economics liberal ignoramus (sorry for the redundancy).

As his idiotic example points out he believes that all the employees that used to work for Kodak were not able to find any other job and that they’re either on the dole or starving to death.

About 100 years ago 95% of the people worked on farms. Today it’s about 4% - and mostly imported labor. Are 90% of the people unemployed and starving?


29 posted on 03/22/2015 9:35:59 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Robert Reich would have us trying to do selfies with a film camera then trying to post it on Facebook.


30 posted on 03/22/2015 9:36:42 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Kodak was selling buggy whips in the digital age.
BS. Besides film, they also sold the same digital products that the Japanese companies sold.
The difference was Kodak's poor management ...
31 posted on 03/22/2015 9:38:00 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“As long as we as a society refuse to give the former slaves much more than they need to survive, in an effort to be humane, then we CAN and WILL continue on this path for ever. BUT if we listen to this liberal idiot and give them to much the whole economic system will collapse and EVERYONE will then be equally miserable. “

Problem is that no matter the level of welfare they get, their primary function is using their sex organs, the one thing that the appear to be successful at doing. Figure out where that takes us!


32 posted on 03/22/2015 9:38:21 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Reich's solution for income inequality is to transfer wealth from the private sector to the public sector for redistribution.

This has been tried in the Soviet Union. Everybody gets poor except the distributors. However I do see most of that system in place in America today. Now all they have to do is follow this Reich for the final solution.

33 posted on 03/22/2015 9:45:57 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarca only ones we can gesm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I’d be interested in seeing some intelligent discussion of what the man actually said.

Look it is intensely obvious that productivity is increasing. Productivity can be defined as the amount of human effort needed to produce goods and services, also known as stuff. As productivity increases, there is more stuff per person. Wealth of the society and of most though not always all individuals goes up.

But continue that curve. By definition, at some point infinite stuff will be produced with zero human input. Or, if that’s taking the curve too far, at some point a great deal of stuff will be produced with very little human input. IOW, there will be little economic demand for whatever input most people are capable of providing.

300 years ago most human input to the economy was via their muscles. Even ships often moved by muscle power. People of low intelligence were just as much in demand for such jobs as the world’s greatest genius. The Industrial Revolution came along and human muscle power became increasingly irrelevant. Productivity and wealth soared, after thousands of years of stagnation.

Today most people work at desks, with their minds. The problem is that those jobs are increasingly being done by computers and robots. This process of course still creates new jobs, but with very few exceptions the new jobs require intelligence quite a ways over on the right side of the Bell Curve. No Lefties Need Apply. This is not an issue of education or training. The taxi-driver laid off because the new taxi is driven by a computer will simply not build a new career writing apps for Android.

The process for a couple hundred years now is that new and better types of jobs are created faster than the old ones are destroyed. Net, net society comes out ahead.

But that’s a historical pattern, not a law of nature.

I’d like to discuss options for handling things if Reich is right, in his prediction if not his prescription.

Is there any way to run a world in which there is very little economic demand for services most people are capable of providing other than redistribution by the government?

Instead of ranting about the iniquities of redistritubion, with which I agree, BTW, what are the alternatives?


34 posted on 03/22/2015 9:46:02 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

First, Get Shorty’s Wealth.


35 posted on 03/22/2015 9:49:09 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

the only man to whom reichhhh measures up is yassar arafat and he is dead


36 posted on 03/22/2015 9:50:47 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven; cripplecreek

Clearly Kodak didn’t make the transition to a digital world.

I put that failure on very shortsighted leaders.

Xerox, on the other hand is interesting. They are responsible for much of the digital economies beginnings and yet failed to embrace the work of their research teams.

Xerox has survived but not without a long and difficult nearly complete restructuring.


37 posted on 03/22/2015 9:50:52 AM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I agree with this. This is a very interesting idea.

My nephew is a robotics engineer. He was visiting a few months back. He works remotely, usually, and was working from my house. He's an intense guy and was working 12-14 hour days in this zone of complete, intense concentration.

It made me think that we ARE reaching a time when there will not be enough "work" for everyone. But, guys like my nephew will still be needed.

We are seeing the creation of a large entitlement class already. People who will and have never really worked. People who have left the workforce who will never return. We are seeing the beginnings of those people being sustained by a guaranteed income by the "state" or the ever smaller group of taxpayers.

How's that work? How and why do guys like my nephew continue to do what they do?

38 posted on 03/22/2015 9:57:39 AM PDT by riri (Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The difference was, Kodak literally invented the digital camera.

Too bad they didn’t have the foresight to capitalise on this breakthrough...


39 posted on 03/22/2015 9:59:53 AM PDT by __rvx86 (Rafael Cruz Jr: soon to be the first conservative, Latino President of the U.S. Si se puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 9thLife
Obama seems to have a “Pixie Dust” theory of economics.
40 posted on 03/22/2015 10:00:18 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson