Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New plan: maybe Obama could just pardon Hillary
Hotair ^ | 03/19/2015 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 03/19/2015 10:26:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: JRandomFreeper

Sort just trying to use common sense,did not think he would pardon her for being an upstanding citizen


21 posted on 03/19/2015 11:18:54 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer
Common sense doesn't apply. It's what the Constitution says. And how the judges interpret it.

I agree with you personally, but that's not what the document says.

His pardon powers are very wide-ranging according to the Constitution.

/johnny

22 posted on 03/19/2015 11:24:04 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Obama: When Obama leaves office, does he have to sign the same or similar form that Hillary did NOT sign when she left as Secretary of State?

What about Kerry? With all the problems that Hillary is having because she did not sign the exit form when she left the State Department, will this put pressure on Kerry to sign the form when he leaves office?

Rice and Powell: We now hear that Candeleza Rice and Powell did not sign the State Department form that Hillary did not sign.

So, why doesn't a reporter or tv host like Kelly and Hannity interview Rice and Powell to get their side of the story as to why they too did not sign the State Department exit form? Enquiring minds want to know.

23 posted on 03/19/2015 11:28:13 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Few people realize how wide-ranging the pardon power is.

It’s about the only power in the Constitution with no check or balance. Obama could, quite constitutionally, on his last day in office pardon all federal prisoners. Or just the black ones.

For those who say he can’t pardon himself, there’s a way around this. Resign on his last day, after pardoning Biden for any offenses. Biden becomes president, briefly, and pardons Obama. Thoroughly constitutional, though equally thoroughly corrupt.


24 posted on 03/19/2015 11:43:55 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

One cannot refuse to accept a pardon. Or, more precisely, you can refuse to accept it, but your refusal doesn’t invalidate it.


25 posted on 03/19/2015 11:45:30 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I understand,hopefully he really does have it in for Hillary and will let her swing in the wind


26 posted on 03/19/2015 11:45:48 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I don’t think being pardoned absolves one from being subpoenaed to testify, or from having to produce evidence responsive to a subpoena or other discovery. A pardon might also prevent the recipient from taking the fifth. Thus Hillary might not be completely in the clear with a presidential pardon in her pocket, and could conceivably be subject to contempt of Congress or a court if she refused to comply with lawful discovery.

I’m not a lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.


27 posted on 03/19/2015 11:47:44 AM PDT by Spartan79 (I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

jOkeass better start now if he hopes to pardon everyone in the regime.


28 posted on 03/19/2015 11:52:06 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

O.J.


29 posted on 03/19/2015 11:53:19 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Then Valerie Jarrett could use that as a method to torpedo Hillary.


30 posted on 03/19/2015 11:59:26 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I may be in error, but doesn’t a pardon imply the commission of a crime and the acknowledgment of same by the individual pardoned?

Does anyone believe a Clinton is about to do that?


31 posted on 03/19/2015 12:05:58 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would he pardon her when he’s orchestrating the attacks?


32 posted on 03/19/2015 12:16:42 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

The President (and most governors) can pardon anyone they choose. They don’t need the agreement or even acquiescence of the person being pardoned.

As others have noted, I suspect a person with a full pardon loses the right to not incriminate himself. Since he can’t, he’s already been pardoned and cannot be prosecuted.


33 posted on 03/19/2015 12:39:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The president can pardon anyone for any offense against the United States, save for treason.

Don't see where it says that. The Constitution says "except in cases of impeachment," not treason.

34 posted on 03/19/2015 12:41:35 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spartan79
RE:”I don’t think being pardoned absolves one from being subpoenaed to testify, or from having to produce evidence responsive to a subpoena or other discovery. A pardon might also prevent the recipient from taking the fifth. Thus Hillary might not be completely in the clear with a presidential pardon in her pocket, and could conceivably be subject to contempt of Congress or a court if she refused to comply with lawful discovery.”

If she gets the nomination next year it is unlikely that this will ever be followed up by legal action no matter who gets the WH,

35 posted on 03/19/2015 5:13:18 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson