Deroy Murdock is attempting to use rational thought as a tool to convince delusional Commies that their hyperventilations are wrong as usual.
The possibility of succeeding in that effort is about the same as his chance of changing the mind of a pile of dog excrement by talking sense to it. The dogpile does not have the capability of listening to, let alone paying attention to, a rational argument.
Too complicated. Which action strengthens Iran - helping them build a nuclear weapon, which Obama’s treaty will do, or warning them that the Senate will not ratify that treaty, which Cotton’s letter does? I’d argue that neither action is treasonous, based as they are on different worldviews and policy disagreements. But if one of them is to be viewed as treasonous, it would have to be Obama’s treaty.
So this is supposed to make the Senate Republicans look good? They’re so pro-Israel and anti-Obama that they’ll draft a strongly worded letter and post it on their facebook account, rather than actually send it to Iran and - gasp - risk offending anybody? 47 Republican Senators and I’m not sure if they have a pair of testicles between them.
He is a traitor. From what I understand, he got on a plane and flew to Paris where he met with the Viet Cong representatives there...
Oh, wait. Never mind.
It was an act of political intimidation even though Cotton never actually posted the letter.
He was "brandishing" the letter for sure. Same thing really.
I am proud to admit I actually asked if the letter had been delivered.I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised so many Dems and Media made such a big deal out of it.
well and Pubs too, just like some Pubs over reacted to the faux shutdown
It would be concerning, if there was a legal problem with mere political speech or a letter devolving nothing more than Constitutional facts. Its not like they were giving away any state or military secretes or really even anything that Iranian leaders shouldn’t have already known.
Sense when is it forbidden by law to speak of the Constitution and political intention?
That said did they undermine Obama’s effort to make a bad deal unsupportable by Congress? Possibility, but that is legitimate, although perhaps rude. Its no more rude and intrusive than Obama’s illegal ‘exclusive’ action robing congress of policy making power on everything from health care to immigration.
If Senate republicans have a legal problem, we have a rather large constitutional free speech problem.
Watching liberal fascism at work is more than interesting. The depths of their delusion seems almost viral, as if they have all , en masse, become infected with a disease that prevents cognitive processing and human logic.
I say we tar and feather the men and inject the women with a cure.Perhaps then their dribbling , drooling mindlessness will be put into the dust bin of history, where it belongs.