[Islander7]

It would appear Laura J. Snyder has researched the history of the scientific methods and their evolution. She seems delighted to have ‘discovered’ what we have known for decades: Science, empirical science, requires reproducible results.

Computer models are not science. Science does not support the religion of AGW.

[outofsalt]

I took the mispaired title and article as a cautionary tale which frankly surprised me by it's publication in Salon.

I don't think most folks appreciate satire.

I was also intrigued by the juxtaposition of science and philosophy (and religion) which I have always found, like chinese food, to leave me hungry. I know I don't appreciate Sartre.

I think I belong to the Popeye school which teaches, "I am what I am" and by extension, "It is what it is". Of course, one must always seek out the meaning of, "is"

Thanks for playing.