Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fallout: Saudis score nuclear reactor deal with South Korea as Obama appeases Iran
Hotair ^ | 03/12/2015 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 03/12/2015 12:07:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Who could have seen this coming? Practically everyone outside the Obama administration, that’s who, but these days it would have been a Logan Act violation to mention it. Saudi Arabia has cut a deal with South Korea to develop two nuclear reactors in the next 20 years, putting Iran’s chief opponent in the region to play a little nuclear escalateo with Tehran:

As U.S. and Iranian diplomats inched toward progress on Tehran’s nuclear program last week, Saudi Arabia quietly signed its own nuclear-cooperation agreement with South Korea.

That agreement, along with recent comments from Saudi officials and royals, is raising concerns on Capitol Hill and among U.S. allies that a deal with Iran, rather than stanching the spread of nuclear technologies, risks fueling it.

Saudi Arabia’s former intelligence chief, Prince Turki al-Faisal, a member of the royal family, has publicly warned in recent months that Riyadh will seek to match the nuclear capabilities Iran is allowed to maintain as part of any final agreement reached with world powers. This could include the ability to enrich uranium and to harvest the weapons-grade plutonium discharged in a nuclear reactor’s spent fuel. …

The memorandum of understanding between Saudi Arabia and South Korea includes a plan to study the feasibility of building two nuclear reactors worth $2 billion in the Arab country over the next 20 years, according to Saudi state media.

Consider this a vote of no confidence from the Saudis in the Iranian deal Barack Obama and John Kerry are crafting with Tehran. The Saudis see Iran as the greatest threat to peace in the region, and for good reason. While they pay lip service to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the biggest issue for Sunni nations is the spread of Iranian influence and terrorism. They have long had control of Syria and Lebanon, and now Iranian proxies have conducted a coup in Yemen, directly in Saudi Arabia’s back yard.

Before now, they’ve at least been able to count on the US and Europe to economically contain Iran, as well as pressure them to end their nuclear-weapons program. Now, though, the P5+1 group has let Tehran off the leash economically to a large extent, and their deal proposes nothing better than a status quo freeze for the next ten years. For Western democracies, ten years is a political lifetime, but in the Middle East, it’s a blink — and the deal is a clear signal from Obama that he’s not interested in anything except a short-term claim to a foreign-policy win.

Not only does that undermine Saudi confidence in the US, but so does its policies in Iraq. Obama pulled out of Iraq and left Nouri al-Maliki in charge to conduct a Shi’ite purge of Sunnis (and Kurds), which led to the collapse of the Iraqi military in which the US had invested so much time and treasure. Obama then put together a small coalition of Sunni nations to fight the Sunni extremists of ISIS, but balked at pushing out Iranian ally Bashar al-Assad out of Syria — and now wants to encourage Iran to conduct military operations in Iraq against ISIS.

It’s become clear to the Saudis and other Sunni nations that Obama’s foreign policy is Iranophile to the point of Western suicide. The US effort in thwarting Iran always had two big motivations: to keep Iran from breaking out as a nuclear power, and to convince the other regimes not to follow suit through confidence in our long-term commitment to the region. This deal signals the end of that era, not because the US has dropped its own lip service to that mission, but because our putative allies simply don’t trust us to follow through. And looking at our track record over the last six years, with Iraq and Libya both failed states and incubators for Islamist terror … who can blame them?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: irantalks; nucleariran; nuclearsaudiarabia; nukes; saudiarabia; southkorea

1 posted on 03/12/2015 12:07:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama is going to make sure that Iran will have the bomb — long before the Saudis get the first reactor up and running.


2 posted on 03/12/2015 12:11:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Saudis will do what the Saudis have always done since the invent of the combustion Engine and discovery of oil in the Middle East.

They will pay to have someone bomb Iran back to the stone Age or exterminate the leadership. Most likely Israel.


3 posted on 03/12/2015 12:15:04 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; TADSLOS; GraceG; SevenofNine; C19fan; Sarah Barracuda
We all should have seen this coming.

Because, War.

War Never Changes.

4 posted on 03/12/2015 12:15:56 PM PDT by KC_Lion (The Issue is Not The Issue, The Issue is The Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I just wanna start a centrifuge manufacturing outfit. Since the Saudi’s are so far behind I figure they are gonna need about 1/2 million fuges to catch up. They got money, pay cash.


5 posted on 03/12/2015 12:16:40 PM PDT by biff (Et Tu Boeh-ner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I read sometime back, that the Saudis have made a deal with Pakistan to purchase 12 to 18 nuke warheads, to be delivered on request when needed
6 posted on 03/12/2015 12:19:37 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to bomb the Saudis for 9/11 and now they are getting a NUKE!! Bomb them!!


7 posted on 03/12/2015 12:21:03 PM PDT by iowacornman (Republican party stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
to be delivered on request when needed...

Do they have to be shipped to the billing address, or can it be sent elsewhere, as in it being a gift... of sorts.

8 posted on 03/12/2015 12:22:05 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Note that the South Koreans are successfully exporting nuclear reactors. we can't even build one in our own country.
9 posted on 03/12/2015 12:27:25 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (Book RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
Found the article over here at BBC
10 posted on 03/12/2015 12:31:39 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robe

I have read that too. I posted on the original article on this. Notice the Saudi did not care Israel has atomic weapons but they sure are getting ready if the Iranian Shia “heretics” get one. Imagine if the Protestants and Catholics has weapons of mass destruction back in the 16th/17 centuries. Although both side did a nice job killing each other, 30% of geographic Germany’s population died during the 30 Years War.


11 posted on 03/12/2015 12:34:35 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson