Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Afterguard

The legal definition of “armor piercing” has nothing to do with ability to pierce armor.

I wish more on our side understood this, as it’s leading to a whole lot of misguided/unnecessary hysteria.


7 posted on 03/07/2015 7:48:04 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Understood. And i did the second letter. I just looked at the first letter and questioned why not just just address the M855.


9 posted on 03/07/2015 8:01:38 PM PST by Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2

Yep. The 30 day comment window the atf offered was only for addressing how to best put the ban into effect. Not if it should be banned or not.


14 posted on 03/07/2015 10:32:20 PM PST by DirtyPigpen (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson