Somehow that used to be so much funnier in the old days...
Posted on 03/04/2015 9:07:04 AM PST by Nachum
TEL AVIV – An email reportedly sent to Hillary Clinton by former Clinton White House staffer Sidney Blumenthal quotes an intelligence source providing information that “wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia” funded the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. special mission in Benghazi.
The leaked emails were published by Russia Today, which says it was forwarded the emails from Blumenthal’s AOL account by the hacker using the alias “Guccifer.”
“Guccifer” reportedly hacked Blumenthal’s email in March 2013. Guccifer has since been identified as Marcel Lazar Lehel, a Romanian hacker serving a seven-year sentence for hacking into the accounts of Romanian government officials.
The alleged memos concern information Blumenthal says he gleaned about the Benghazi attack and the January 2013 hostage crisis at a gas complex in Amenas, Algeria.
One purported Blumenthal email from Feb. 16, 2013, addressed to Clinton quoted sources “with direct access to the Libyan National Government, as well as the highest levels of European governments, and Western intelligence and security services.”
The email said the information comes from “extremely sensitive sources and should be handled with care.”
The email quotes an “individual with sensitive access” stating information provided by French security services indicated the funding for both the Benghazi and Algeria attacks “originated with wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.”
Continued the purported email: “During July and August 2012, these financiers provided funds to AQIM contacts in Southern Europe, who in turn passed the money onto AQIM operatives in Mauritania.”
AQIM refers to Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
See #60.
Somehow that used to be so much funnier in the old days...
Thanks.
Weren’t some of the terrorists overheard saying they were sent by Morsi?
Now we have a death threat from a secretive and powerful government official to go along with the suspicious death of an investigative journalist.
Motive & Opportunity
Now we have a death threat from a secretive and powerful government official to go along with the suspicious death of an investigative journalist.
Motive & Opportunity
Now we have a death threat from a secretive and powerful government official to go along with the suspicious death of an investigative journalist.
Motive & Opportunity
Yes they were.
The attack was planned then the protest over the video was planned to create the “spontaneous” lie.
If you take the info from the OBL doc recovered in Afghanistan, you can work out a pattern to the terrorist attacks since the 1st WTC bombing in 1993.
Prior to each and every major terrorist attack, attempted attack, or threat of attack the left will always gin up civil unrest, attempt to gin up civil unrest, or have a plan to gin up civil unrest.
That’s why it was a “spontaneous” protest followed by a “spontaneous” terrorist attack lie.
Orchestrating civil unrest and follow with terrorist attack is straight out of the Weather Underground playbook
Like the OWS protests and the Arab Spring?
Look at the attempted car bombing in NYC in 2010.
The left and their allies in the MSM started a talking points campaign claiming the TEA Party was a bunch of ultra violent, racist, right wing extremist, Tim McVeigh wannabes, out to overthrow the govt of the US.
Low and behold the car bomb was a fertilizer bomb like McVeigh used so Bloomberg said because it was a fertilizer bomb like McVeigh used it had to be the TEA Party since they were a bunch of Tim McVeigh wannabes.
The left started saying the TEA Party were terrorist and needed to be rounded up.
The IRS had started targeting the TEA Party a couple of months before demanding the names of everyone associated with TEA Party groups.
There is 4 possibilities with that attempted attack.
1. The dems orchestrated the news for the attack to blame the TEA Party.
2. The terrorist picked up on the dems talking points about the TEA Party from the news and “spontaneously” planned the attack to match the dems talking points.
3. The TEA Party actually did it.
4. It’s all just a coincidence.
We know the TEA Party didn’t do it.
From the OBL doc we know the news is 90% of the preparation for the battle so it’s not just a coincidence.
That leaves option 1 or 2.
The dems orchestrated the news for the attack or the terrorist picked up on the news and “spontaneously” planned the attack.
With Benghazi, setting it up to make it look like the right wing extremist had planned another October Surprise or the terrorist had picked up on the dems praising Peanuts Carter Hillary was flipping the question.
Dems collaborating with terrorist had been taken out of the 2 options and replaced with repubs collaborating with the terrorist.
Simple attorney trick.
There of course had to be a reason she would do what would surely be appreciated by millions as a farcical lie. That's a dear price of shamefulness and treason that one would not pay if one didn't feel forced to do so. It must have been perceived as her best (focus grouped? and perhaps only) shot.
HF
People Like Hitlary become immune to the effects their decisions have on others. They learn or have Narcassistic personalities. Their Life is all that is important. They lie with impunity. They believe no matter how unreal their lies are people will believe them. IMHO part of that personality trait is also the belief that they are immune to any danger from any action or decision they make. Right up to the Point Leaders with her mindset in most 3rd world Countries get their Necks stretched.
Is Piglosi the Plastic gal on television crying yet over it?
bfl
Got me thinking, once he becomes a liability to his keepers....then what? I suspect they really won't like a lose cannon running his mouth about how smart he was to pull the wool over everyone's eyes.
My bet is they are trying to make it appear as if Hillary was doing everything in such secret nobody else knew what she was doing.
The links to the Saudis who financed his education -- Al-Waleed bin Talal and Khalid Al-Mansour -- seem to end, but since that campaign financing would be illegal, they merely faded into the background. The money certainly continued for a fellow up-and-coming muslim marxist/socialist/NWO, Barry 0bummer.
Doesn't she look like something right out of Revelation?
Seriously... "...the beast..."
Is WND considered a reliable source?
meanwhile back at the clintoon foundation the saudi’s have given the clintoons millions.
The same saudis who financed and and did 9-11.
our good friends.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.