Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/04/2015 8:36:49 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3264067/posts



Skip to comments.

Clinton ran own computer system for her official emails (sneaky thunderthighs!)
AP ^ | 03/04/15 | By JACK GILLUM and TED BRIDIS

Posted on 03/04/2015 8:18:46 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway

WASHINGTON (AP) - The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Rodham Clinton's emails - on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state - traced back to an Internet service registered to her family's home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press.

The highly unusual practice of a Cabinet-level official physically running her own email would have given Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, impressive control over limiting access to her message archives. It also would distinguish Clinton's secretive email practices as far more sophisticated than some politicians, including Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin, who were caught conducting official business using free email services operated by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: 1dontsearch

1 posted on 03/04/2015 8:18:46 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
The only thing of note is that absolutely nothing is going to happen to her. Nothing.

The laws don't apply to the nobility.

2 posted on 03/04/2015 8:20:52 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

The Clintons have always been Crooks


3 posted on 03/04/2015 8:22:42 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

Lipstick on a pig...


4 posted on 03/04/2015 8:22:56 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
I agree that nothing legally will happen to Ms. "What Does It Matter," but politically someone in the Obama camp has set her up to lose the nomination.
5 posted on 03/04/2015 8:23:02 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
if this isnt the straw that breaks the camels back I dont know what POSSIBLY could be!


6 posted on 03/04/2015 8:23:35 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

You are correct...She will go on her merry-ass way!


7 posted on 03/04/2015 8:23:50 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Would she do the same as President? What are the security implications?


8 posted on 03/04/2015 8:24:39 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
...on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state...

AP is trying to trick us into accepting two "facts" in one sentence that simply are not in evidence.

9 posted on 03/04/2015 8:24:39 AM PST by hlmencken3 (“I paid for an argument, but you’re just contradicting!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

If this wasn’t also a matter of national security - which it clearly is - I might be just laughing about all of this. I gotta believe there’s one reason she did this. I wasn’t about avoiding future scrutiny or email archives: I bet it was because she didn’t trust Obama one whit.


10 posted on 03/04/2015 8:24:50 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Is this the service and email address she (And Bill) mused to raise funds for the Clinton FOundation from foreign governments???


11 posted on 03/04/2015 8:27:33 AM PST by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
politically someone in the Obama camp has set her up to lose the nomination

Under Obama, no Democrat has come forward as a developing leader. Unless Elizabeth Warren gets involved if hillary has to drop out (anyone else would have to at this point), it wouldn't be hard to have some almost-unknown fill the void.

12 posted on 03/04/2015 8:28:10 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

LSM response will be digging through Walkers emails, server etc..


13 posted on 03/04/2015 8:28:25 AM PST by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Sneaky is not the word to describe it.

ILegal is!


14 posted on 03/04/2015 8:28:41 AM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

the level of sophistication and effort needed to implement speaks volume about the intent

but the press will first play dumb and then run interference for anybody that questions


15 posted on 03/04/2015 8:29:42 AM PST by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
The rules are always different for the Clintons.

Look at the prosecution of David Petraeus. He may have violated a law but no harm was done. As Giuliani pointed out, for the government to go after him required Obama's OK. Will Obama authorize any action against Hillary? Highly unlikely even though they despise each other.

16 posted on 03/04/2015 8:29:42 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
The rules are always different for the Clintons.

Look at the prosecution of David Petraeus. He may have violated a law but no harm was done. As Giuliani pointed out, for the government to go after him required Obama's OK. Will Obama authorize any action against Hillary? Highly unlikely even though they despise each other.

17 posted on 03/04/2015 8:29:42 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Am I supposed to be outraged because she has her own email? Really?

These are the Clintons. They must think we have short memories. These are the people who had goon squads and death lists and managed to leave office with hundreds of millions in the bank THAT WE KNOW OF... Email? Jeepers creepers.


18 posted on 03/04/2015 8:33:58 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

She is bad to the bone with her shit eating grin!


19 posted on 03/04/2015 8:35:40 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: molson209

“The Clintons have always been Crooks”

I have to disagree with you, a crook is someone that has been caught and punished.

Caught and praised as the smartest women in the world doesn’t qualify .


20 posted on 03/04/2015 8:36:20 AM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson