Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

And quite possibly a technique for making content available to those with considerable hacking resources. Easier to snoop a home-brew server than national security level systems. If you _want_ someone to have access who, officially, must not ... what better way than keep those official secrets where those you want to sneak a peek can?


10 posted on 03/04/2015 7:22:59 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

And that breach would not have any “tracks”.

Interesting theory, but I don’t think the Clintons would be of that mindset, to intentionally give away national security secrets. They’re more along the lines of “let’s get away with stuff the law doesn’t allow us to do”.


16 posted on 03/04/2015 8:03:51 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2

Excellent point!


21 posted on 03/04/2015 9:01:47 AM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson