Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buwaya
Most Sikhs are Singhs (at least it seems that way), but apparently there are way more Hindu Singhs than there are Sikhs.

*ALL* devout male Sikhs usually adopt the surname of Singh (Lion in Hindi). It is actually part of traditional Sikh religious belief, as much a part of the devout, practicing Sikh as the kirpan (dagger) on his person.

That there exist Sikhs who do not follow this tradition is a fact not unknown to me, but the majority of practicing Sikhs do follow this tradition, so much so that whenever I hear someone has the surname of Signh, I pretty much assume that the bearer of the name is a practicing Sikh (yeah, I know I *could* be wrong, but more often than not, it holds true...)

the infowarrior

33 posted on 03/02/2015 2:32:59 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: infowarrior

Yes, I have run into several non-Singh Sikhs.

And some not-Sikh Singhs.

Sikhs tend to emigrate at a much higher rate than other Indians (I think that 1/3 or more of all of them live elsewhere) so outside of India they seem to exist in larger numbers and have a greater presence than they do in India proper.
There aren’t really that many Sikhs, under 2% of the Indian population.


35 posted on 03/02/2015 3:00:06 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson