Posted on 03/02/2015 11:07:33 AM PST by TangledUpInBlue
The article makes a sweeping claim then gives only one example in regards to be headings. And even that is a weak one.
Mohammed gave a command for beheading then enemy then gave a suggestion for what to do with prisoners. You don’t have a misinterpretation... You have a legit disagreement over scripture.
...If it smells like Big Government or goat-eating blasphemous thugs, the smell might mean more than the taqiyya from the Left.
It seems to me this article is a lie written to support Obama’s lie about ISIS Islamism. Total bullshit.
In the world of PR, this is considered “repositioning the narrative.”
Undoubtedly they will continue to build upon the concept...
Face it. The United States is led by a delusional President who is about to sign an agreement with lunatic “death loving” mullahs who will as a result obtain nuclear weapons. He is protected by a MSM that sees the world through the prism of white guilt and the fallacy of “white privlidge”.
ISIS follows the Koran to the letter.
This isn’t about doctrinal differences. You can get as many disagreements over doctrine within Buddhism and Christianity as you can within Islam. The difference is that nobody in Buddhism or Christianity is beheading scores of people over them.
The majority of muslims clearly support the imposition of sharia on a global scale. That renders ALL of them suspect if not outright guilty of subversion.
All muslims are obligated by their faith to seek global submission to Islam. Shariah law for all.
Convert, submit or die.
They are pure Islam as practiced by Mohammed himself. With half the worlds muslim believing the Mhaddi’s return is evident and they have no problem trying to hasten that. You have 750 million muslims ready to become jihadi’s, support them or not do anything to thwart others
So Houston we do have a problem
Freegards
LEX
Experts? Like Obama, ValJar, John Kerry, and CAIR.
islam is not a religion and hence not subject to Constitutional protections; legislation alone should do the trick. It's high time we had a measured, national debate on this issue.
I think a ton of this is ongoing knee jerk reaction to Graeme Wood’s write up in the notoriously hard liberal Atlantic, where he actually said that ISIS in fact is a truly Islamic groups that does what they do based first and foremost on their interpretations of the Quran, Hadiths, and Sura. In that write up, Graeme in fact was still being what one might call PC in that he affirmed that peaceful, liberal Muslims’ interpretation of Islam is as valid as ISIS’s. However, it was quite possibly the first time in the 14 years since 9/11 that a liberal publication openly acknowledged that ISIS and fundamentalist Islamic groups like ISIS do what they do for Islamic reasons above all else. And the backlash has been going on for weeks now.
read the Koran and you will see that ISIS is VERY Islamic indeed, as are all of Obama’s good friends in Islamic terror gangs like Muslim Brotherhood, etc.
Co-authored by Hamza Hendawi, I am certain the “experts” were carefully vetted for their objective views. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!
Not delusional. Malicious.
Unless the author can name the clerics in question then I call BS on this claim.
An article about how benign Islam really is and the Koran is being misinterpreted but the best they could find is a passage instructing their followers to ransom their POWs
And?
The ISIS types say that these clerics are cowards or apostates, who don't take their faith seriously. So we, who are not mohammedans, have to look to the history of mohammedanism to see which group is more authentic. And since mohammedanism displays a history of bloody conquest, persecution, and genocide ....
Looks like ISIS is pure mohammedanism. Accept no substitutes. None genuine without Mad Mo's signature. Written in blood.
NONE of the GOP’s 2016 “hopefuls” are even talking about this. It’s time for the Tea Party and others to raise the issue so forcefully that they cannot continue to ignore it.
I think this is a position that could swing a lot of independents and Democrats to our side — though they would never admit it to pollsters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.