Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CSM

I’m glad Rush is staying on the subject.

SeeBS had a simplistic interpretation for net neutrality with no cons. I hope it comes back to bite them in the arse.


27 posted on 03/02/2015 9:39:58 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks ( Laughter is the best medicine, unless you have diarrhea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks

I watched a GB interview of Mark Cuban and he made a good point. It is that bits are bits, so if all bits are forced to be treated the same, then there is no opportunity for video, TV broadcast, website searches, texts or other byts to be treated with a priority. Now, ask yourself why TV never buffers when you are watching it?

The answer is that they pay cable for their spot on the dial, therefore their byts get priority. Without that priority, normal HD TV broadcasting could be delayed and end up with buffering....

Yay, for utopian progress-ivism.


44 posted on 03/02/2015 10:15:25 AM PST by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson