She’s a pro-abort, pro-infancticide liberal loon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/05/29/DI2009052902325.html
Ana Marie Cox: I don’t want to get in the way of Tucker’s dialog with our shared audience at the moment, mostly because I respect Tucker’s personal views on abortion and know that his comments about Tiller are come to honestly — if someone believes that abortion is murder, someone like Tiller would necessarily seem reprehensible. There are no good parallels, but I think there’s weight to the one a lot of young pro-life conservatives I know use: Would you ask an abolitionist to think more charitably about a slaveowner? You can ask a pro-life person to believe in the essential humanity of someone like Tiller, you can expect a pro-life person to honor Tiller’s “right to live,” but you can’t reasonably expect any kind of sympathy.
Nothing, however, justifies a citizen’s cold-blooded murder of someone he disagrees with, no matter what level of moral outrage that disagreement reaches. And Tiller’s murder — at his church, in front of friends and family — is itself such a moral outrage that I think it’s set back the pro-life movement at least several years, if not a decade.
I know I don’t feel a whole lot of sympathy for them right now.
Oh, and on that cheerful note! Have a good week. Be well, be grateful, be safe.
http://therightscoop.com/msnbc-guest-rand-paul-using-baby-picture-as-background-to-speech-is-pornographic/
Daily Beast columnist Ana Marie Cox brought the crazy to MSNBC this morning when they were discussing the Values Voter Summit, and commentators had to top each other with how disgusted they are with pictures of unborn children. She definitely won the contest to be the most contemptible degenerate by calling it pornographic.
Watch at link
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/18/house-republican-abortion-bill-ban-twenty-weeks
The GOP’s latest abortion ban push is staggeringly stupid
Ana Marie Cox
It’s a truism verging on dogma that history favors steady progress toward equal rights for gays. The last election cycle saw incredible gains for marriage equality and representation for gays and lesbians in government. There is a movement in the Republican party to at least stop fighting the issue, and at least a recognition that they cannot hope to grow the party as long as young voters associate opposition to marriage equality with a general stance of intolerance and bigotry.
Funny how attitudes haven’t shifted in the same way when it comes to women and, especially, anything to do with sex. Why are debates about reproductive rights mired in Neanderthal attitudes...
Today, we have a whole generation of whom a majority has never themselves had a friend get sick from an abortion performed in unsterile environment, never had to have unsafe sex because they simply didn’t have access to birth control, and had only on TV seen a teenager give up for adoption an unwanted child and there, the situation is sanitized, if not idyllic.
As other feminists have argued, the unspeakable horror that came to light in the trial of Philadelphia abortion “doctor” Kermit Gosnell was not an illustration of the horrors inherent in a post-Roe world, but in a pre-Roe one. And it’s only because abortion is comparatively safe and legal that we confuse the two....
What do Republican women want?
Ana Marie Cox
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/29/what-do-republican-women-want
Thanks. A little research goes a long way to show us the wolves in sheep’s clothing.
What does she say in yesterday’s article in Daily Beast about abortion?