Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration to ban bullets; AR-15 targeted
American Thinker ^ | 2/27/15 | Rick Moran

Posted on 02/27/2015 3:09:33 PM PST by BlatherNaut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: BlatherNaut

Is anybody surprised? I’m certainly not.


21 posted on 02/27/2015 3:31:30 PM PST by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
It's simple, the "2nd Amendment" was crafted to assure that the general populace was always a viable counter balance to the might of our Federal government agencies and its “well regulated militia”. Thusly, the founders intended we, the populace, have the means (weaponry) to keep government at bay and if necessary to actually violently rebel and overthrow a despotic regime. Yes, think about it, if the police and the government's military have metal penetrating projectiles, then the general population should also. You you don't like the Bill of Rights, then change them in the prescribed Constitutional way.
22 posted on 02/27/2015 3:41:05 PM PST by RAY (God Bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

What SHALL NOT be infringed is the right to keep and bear ARMS.

ARMS without ammo might be guns, but they are no longer ARMS.


23 posted on 02/27/2015 3:43:39 PM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

Why did you even think that?


24 posted on 02/27/2015 3:45:31 PM PST by DirtyPigpen (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Why can't cartridges be defined as "arms" and thereby protected under the Second amendment?

Do you really think Obama cares about the Constitution? He's been going over Congress' head for years, what makes you think he'll have a change of heart?

25 posted on 02/27/2015 3:54:40 PM PST by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
Congress should ban Handguns capable of shooting 5.56 ammo.

No, they should either re-define what a "handgun" is, or simply repeal the section of the underlying law which allows unelected ATF staffers with political agendas to conjure up regulations on what ammunition is banned.

If they are going to ban ammunition, then the Congress should just list the banned ammo and vote on it. I think we'll see a very short list if members of the House have to explain their votes to their constituents.

26 posted on 02/27/2015 3:57:34 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
"The target this time is the most popular sporting and target shooting rifles sold in America; the AR-15."

Upgrade. That'll teach 'em.

27 posted on 02/27/2015 4:11:47 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Me too! Unless they come from Soviet Union which the Brown Clown stopped importation of when his panties got in a wad over Putin and the Ukaraine.


28 posted on 02/27/2015 4:18:08 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Yeah. If 5.56 is bad, and it’s the smallest, well...do the math.


29 posted on 02/27/2015 4:41:06 PM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Your enemy will bring to you all the weapons you need to defeat him- Mao TseTung


30 posted on 02/27/2015 4:49:32 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

When i came back from SouthEast Asia, i wanted no part of any rifle that was semi-auto, whether it was produced by The Free World, or from a design that originated in the Soviet bloc.

I watched, as Bill clinton signed the firearms ban. I noticed that ‘cowboy calibers and firearms’ were not affected. So i chose that route.

Now, with all DiFi’s Dummies, and the queer-in-charge trying with every fiber of their being, to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans, I figured they would go after the same firearms. They tried. So, it seems that they are going for the other components, cartridges.

So, before the queer-in-charge, in his midnight confessions to his dear michael/mooch get the ideas, as you are able, switch calibers!!! The queer-in-charge thinks he has taken the sting away from all you preppers.

A suggestion ... go search for ‘hickok45’ and ‘guide gun’ on youtube. Once you see, you will understand.


31 posted on 02/27/2015 4:51:04 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billys kid

What do you want me to explain?


32 posted on 02/27/2015 7:37:43 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

What?


33 posted on 02/27/2015 8:06:19 PM PST by cbvanb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire

“In the Ottoman Empire, in accordance with the Muslim dhimmi system, Christians were guaranteed limited freedoms (such as the right to worship), but were treated as second-class citizens. They were forbidden to carry weapons or ride on horseback, their houses could not overlook those of Muslims, and their religious practices would have to defer to those of Muslims, in addition to various other legal limitations.[153]”

Now I can understand why Obama, as a Marxist and a Muzzie, is pushing the gun control and getting people out of their cars.


34 posted on 02/27/2015 10:02:30 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyPigpen; freeandfreezing; cbvanb

Sorry. I am ashamed of myself.


35 posted on 02/28/2015 6:29:15 AM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dware
Even if we were to get a Court to prohibit the actions of the kenyan dictator, he has shown, as in his immigration edict, that he is more than willing to defy the order.

What's the next step?

36 posted on 02/28/2015 10:40:14 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Some say I hate 0bama; "HATE" is a strong word, but in this case NOT STRONG ENOUGH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson