Posted on 02/27/2015 5:41:51 AM PST by HomerBohn
WASHINGTON D.C. (INTELLIHUB) — Thursday the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted on and approved the end of the Internet as we know it.
That’s right the ‘information superhighway’ has just been obliterated by the passage of “Net Neutrality” which allows the FCC to regulate the once free and independent Internet.
Essentially it’s like putting a person or a checkpoint between point A and point B in which one may eventually have to check in with. Call me a conspiracy theorist but that would be a “gatekeeper” which proponents of the plan promised wouldn’t exist. Although this analogy may seem far-fetched to some, and hasn’t fully manifest itself yet, we will just have to wait and see. But rest assured there will be nothing neutral about Net Neutrality.
The whole “Net Neutrality” thing was made to sound good to everyone as they’ve sugar-coated it [their plan] for the dumbed-down masses, hoodwinking them into accepting it.
When past meets the present
Die-hard radio talk show host Howard Stern and others such as rapper Eminem have went toe-to-toe with the FCC on ‘freedom of speech’ issues and know good and well just how diabolic the FCC can truly be at times. And for that reason people like myself will never trust the FCC as nothing good has ever came from the agency.
The fact of the matter is the agency is only there to regulate information which we can watch, read, and listen to. They want to be the middleman between the content and our brains which will eventually lead to the full-on manipulation of and/or the suppression of information in which they [the powers-that-be] deem we don’t need to know.
And encase you didn’t know yet, as sheep, we are already on a ‘need to know’ basis. It’s the program that our masters have designed for us. They have subconsciously transplanted it into our minds slowly through many years of governmental mind control experimentation sessions. The brunt of it all started with the T.V., but has now morphed into what futurists would describe as an active environment, digitally speaking of course. Where man interacts with machine. They want to control cyberspace period.
Interestingly enough the final rules wont be published for several days which is seen by some as a ‘stall’ that may allow regulators to insert more legal muck; i.e. jargon, into the mix before the passage becomes viable law in just a few short months.
You see, just as Hitler positioned himself and his team above the populace of Germany in the 1930′s, the Obama Administration has done the same — driving the final nail into the proverbial coffin, representing the death of the Internet itself.
Moreover now under Executive Orders and National Security Presidential Directives, such as 51, the President of the United States has powers vested in him to shut off the Internet, which has now been classified as a “utility” under the new regulation, during any “crisis” or “national emergency”.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the kill switch. The Internet kill switch.
You have to admit it was a brilliant go-around.
They got us good.
A letter from the President reads:
Furthermore, these's so much money in the internet that the government will eventually be bought off...and everything will return to normal.
I wonder how long they will wait before they start just shutting off the websites seemed to me “socially irresponsible.”
I’ve noticed a new narrative about “unreliable” news. Liberals are complaining about questionable news sources that titillate with “clickbait” and slander. That’s going to be the new censorship. Any attacks on liberals/Democrats is going to be outlawed as “fake” news.
I’m still trying to figure out what, when the rubber meets the road, is bad about this, other than the principle itself.
BTW, it’s “in case”, not “encase”. ;-)
I wonder how long they will wait before they start just shutting off the websites deemed to be “socially irresponsible.”
But why did the Stasi collect all this information in its archives? The main purpose was to control the society. In nearly every speech, the Stasi minister gave the order to find out who is who, which meant who thinks what. He didn't want to wait until somebody tried to act against the regime. He wanted to know in advance what people were thinking and planning. The East Germans knew, of course, that they were surrounded by informers, in a totalitarian regime that created mistrust and a state of widespread fear, the most important tools to oppress people in any dictatorship.- Hubertus Knabe, German historian"
East Germany isn't a warning to American Progressives.
Its a Goal and an Instruction Manual.
Probably not long, within 6 months at the most. Free Republic will be one of those deemed “socially irresponsible”. Enjoy it while you can.
This will land up in the fed courts, count on it.
In 6 months, I am confident that FR will still be around.
Web site “A” gets 10,000 conservative posts.
Web site “A” can no longer accept conservative posts until the count for liberal posts is equal and neutral at 10,000.
Any attempt to post conservative information during this restricted period is a violation of federal law and all 2nd amendment rights are withdrawn as you are officially placed on the suspected terrorist watch list for life without revocation possible.
We are seeing a liberalism that has gone terminal.
See you in court!
> I’m still trying to figure out what, when the rubber meets the road, is bad about this, other than the principle itself.
Surely you jest.
(1) Increased taxation. This time its about adding taxes to your ISP bill.
(2) Control and manipulation of content. They don’t like what you have to say they can either cut you off or slow your packet speed to a crawl. Of course you may not be able to prove it though.
(3) Easier access for monitoring. No more need to go to service providers and install devices on their networks. I’m pretty sure “filtering” hubs will be set up that the ISPs will reroute you through from what I’ve read. What does this mean to the end consumer? Your Internet will be slowed by the monitoring process.
Translation: “open and free” = opposite of what he said it would be
Once again The gullibe are completely manipulated by the conman in chief.
I have been stocking up on books and preparing for my family’s exit from the internet and TV. I have gotten rid of my iPhone and will be saving money as an added bonus.
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not. In the second paragraph of o’s ltr “More than 4 million people wrote in to the FCC, overwhelmingly in support of a free and fair internet. Is this going to be like the free obamama phone? Will we have the free Obama net?
Ah, another institution TOTALLY NOT ACCOUNTABLE to our three branches of government! Like the Fed.........just what our founding fathers planned! /s
BUT, they are under the control of a dictator-president.......
See this...Al Sharpton gets the boot...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.