Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"But now we face the really hard part: making sure the FCC doesn’t abuse its authority."

Aye - there's the rub. Anyone who thinks that any agency in this lawless administration will exercise restraint is sorely deluded. Big win for the tyrant.

1 posted on 02/26/2015 3:43:07 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: NewHampshireDuo

Dear FCC:

GFY!


2 posted on 02/26/2015 3:44:56 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Button down those firewalls! This is going to get messy.


3 posted on 02/26/2015 3:45:41 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

I’m sure it will cost us more money. It always does.


5 posted on 02/26/2015 3:48:11 PM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Now the botnets will be able DDOS entire backbones.


6 posted on 02/26/2015 3:51:55 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

The government has never exercised “restraint” in implementing and enforcing rules. They just heap more rules on top of rules. Good luck go us all.


7 posted on 02/26/2015 3:52:20 PM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Aren’t there two previous court cases that said the FCC does not have the legal authority to regulate the Internet? I also seem to recall a specific Congressional prohibition for the FCC to regulate the Internet. I guess this is what fascism looks like.


8 posted on 02/26/2015 3:53:18 PM PST by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

“which means users, hackers, tinkerers, artists, and knowledge seekers can continue to innovate and experiment on the Internet, using any app or service they please, without having to get their ISP’s permission first.”

Is this an issue for residential customers? I use business class service since I telework so much and with that, I’ve never encountered any problems from the isp.


10 posted on 02/26/2015 3:53:43 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Omg. The authors are complete dumbasses


11 posted on 02/26/2015 3:56:37 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ( Better a conservative teabagger than a liberal teabagee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

“And a vague rule gives the FCC an awful lot of discretion, potentially giving an unfair advantage to parties with insider influence. That means our work is not yet done. We must stay vigilant, and call out FCC overreach.”

You over educated idiots. Your work is not yet done? You just piled on top of your heads a heck of a lot more work because of your support for net neutrality. Staying vigilant and calling out FCC overreach will do little to nothing about the new tyranny you have supported. Much like obamacare supporters who learned the hard way that they supported garbage legislation, I imagine it will take a ton of bricks to fall on your heads too before you buy a clue.


14 posted on 02/26/2015 4:02:53 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo
If you like your freedom of speech, you will be able to keep your freedom of speech. Period.

If you like your internet, you will be able to keep your internet. Period.

No one will take them away. No matter what.


18 posted on 02/26/2015 4:09:49 PM PST by OwenKellogg (CRUZ or LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

The size 20 foot of the Gummint is once again in the door.


19 posted on 02/26/2015 4:11:25 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo; All

Noting that the FCC was established under the administration of Constitution-ignoring socialist FDR, even if the FCC made the right decision about the Internet, it remains that only Congress has the constitutional authority to make such decisions. So corrupt, RINO-controlled Congress needs to stop hiding behind federal agencies like the FCC with respect to unpopular federal policies.


22 posted on 02/26/2015 4:18:27 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Fox reports the following:

These new rules would not only affect your services, it would also give FCC regulators the power to decide what content on the Internet was “just and reasonable.” Commissioner Tom Wheeler makes the absurd comment that the FCC would never use those powers. But in a February 4 issue of Wired, he already hints at ways bureaucrats could start dictating what they view as “threats” on the Internet:

“…my proposal includes a general conduct rule that can be used to stop new and novel threats to the Internet. This means the action we take will be strong enough and flexible enough not only to deal with the realities of today, but also to establish ground rules for the as yet unimagined.”


24 posted on 02/26/2015 4:19:50 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Team Internet?

What a bunch of homes.


25 posted on 02/26/2015 4:20:15 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

I one fell swoop, the FCC just took over all forms of communication, including TV. A 21st Century Pravda. Watch the wrong news channel, get audited.


26 posted on 02/26/2015 4:25:15 PM PST by IamConservative (If fighting fire with fire is a good idea, why do the pros use water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Did they read the regulation they support!


27 posted on 02/26/2015 4:26:05 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Will they ban Smoke Signals next?


29 posted on 02/26/2015 4:42:27 PM PST by Mark (Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

31 posted on 02/26/2015 4:46:12 PM PST by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

“But now we face the really hard part: making sure the FCC doesn’t abuse its authority.”

Name ONE federal agency that has NEVER ABUSED it’s authority...

(crickets...)


35 posted on 02/26/2015 4:57:21 PM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewHampshireDuo

No. What “Team Internet” did was let the Government in the door. It doesn’t matter that the enacted a narrow set of rules “now”. People never learn.


37 posted on 02/26/2015 5:07:16 PM PST by sigzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson